What is the difference between potential difference and potential?

AI Thread Summary
Potential difference refers to the measurable difference in electric potential between two points, while potential itself is an absolute value that cannot be measured directly. Conventional current flows from high potential to low potential, indicating that current carriers accelerate towards areas of greater negative potential difference. The potential at a point can be defined relative to a reference point, typically set to zero, without affecting the potential difference between two points. An analogy to gravity illustrates this concept, where potential energy is defined relative to a reference height. Overall, the key takeaway is that current, like other forms of energy, flows from areas of higher potential to lower potential.
sgstudent
Messages
726
Reaction score
3
For conventional current, they say that it moves from high potential to low potential. What does this mean? pd at a point is the potential at the further end minus the closer end. So what does it mean? Thanks for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You cannot talk about the potential difference at a point. It is only defined along a path. The main difference between potential difference and the potential itself is that potential difference can be measured, while the potential itself cannot. In fact, you are free to place the zero of the potential at any point you please. However, this will not change the potential difference between different points.

That "current moves from high potential to low potential" is a qualitative description of this fact. The more precise meaning is that the current carriers will accelerate in the direction of steepest (greatest negative) instantaneous potential difference.
 
In this context, you could say that potential is simply potential difference from a point to the reference point or ground, i.e., the point in your circuit where you define the potential to be zero. Potential difference is the difference in potential between two given points, neither one of which is the reference point

Explaining this with an analogy using gravity, things would go something like this.

Let's say we are standing at ground level and so we declare the ground to have zero potential energy. Ground is our reference, any mass that we raise above ground level will acquire a potential energy of mgh. mgh is your potential. If you have two of the same objects at difference heights, the potential difference would be mgh1 - mgh2, if h2 is lower than h1, then you have a positive potential difference...this could drive a "current" from point at h1 to point in h2...in other words, if you take a table and raise one end to a height of 24 inches and the other end to a height of just 12 inches...and you put a ball on the higher end...will it flow to the lower (potential) end? ...what if you put the ball in the lower end, will it climb to the higher end all by itself?

so, yes, current flows from the high potential to the low potential.

And not just current, also heat flows from high temperature to low temperature.

And, so, I simply keep a short statement in my head to remind me of this: Power flows downhill.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top