What Is The Difference Between These Dielectric Terms?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the differences between dielectric terms: the dielectric constant refers to a material's ability to store electrical energy, while the relative dielectric constant compares this ability to that of a vacuum. Dielectric loss indicates energy dissipation in a dielectric material, often represented by a resistance in a capacitor. The symbols "δ" and "εr'" relate to the loss angle and relative permittivity, respectively. The equation provided describes how the dielectric properties affect wave propagation in materials. Understanding these concepts is essential for analyzing the behavior of capacitors with non-ideal dielectrics.
FredericChopin
Messages
101
Reaction score
0
What Is The Difference Between These "Dielectric" Terms?

Can someone please explain to me what the difference between these terms are?

1. Dielectric constant
2. Relative dielectric constant
3. Dielectric loss

I came across them on this website:

http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/microwave.html#pen

Also, I don't really know what "δ" and "εr'" on the website are meant to represent.

All and any help would be appreciated.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Also, does anyone know the derivation to the equation:

$$\alpha = \frac{2 \pi }{ \lambda } \sqrt[]{ \frac{ \varepsilon_r \sqrt[]{1 + tan^{2} \delta } - 1}{2} }$$

, which is also on the website?

Thank you.
 
An ideal capacitor has no losses, a dielectric introduced between the plates just changes the total capacitance in proportion to the relative dielectric constant.

An non-ideal dielectric also introduces a loss, which we represent by a resistance between the plates. So the real capacitor shows both capacitance and resistance; I think that leads to the angle you have there, δ.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top