What is the direction of the currents in each side?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the direction of current in a circuit with multiple branches. Participants emphasize that the direction can be inferred from the signs of the calculated current values after setting up the system of equations. A negative result indicates an incorrect initial guess for the current's direction. The importance of Kirchhoff's laws is highlighted, particularly in relation to junctions and loop equations. Properly setting up the equations is crucial for accurately solving for all current values in the circuit.
horsedeg
Messages
39
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


28-p-021-alt.gif

(a) Determine the current in each branch of the circuit.

Homework Equations


V=IR
Summation of the voltages in a loop = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


I have this problem figured out in general, but the only thing confusing me is the current in the middle.
What exactly determines the direction of the current in the middle branch? It screwed me over so bad in a similar problem on a test. The current in the middle is pointing down, but why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
horsedeg said:

Homework Statement


28-p-021-alt.gif

(a) Determine the current in each branch of the circuit.

Homework Equations


V=IR
Summation of the voltages in a loop = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


I have this problem figured out in general, but the only thing confusing me is the current in the middle.
What exactly determines the direction of the current in the middle branch? It screwed me over so bad in a similar problem on a test. The current in the middle is pointing down, but why?

When you write out the system of equations from each branch and solve, you should be able to determine the direction of current from the magnitude (whether they're positive or negative.) A negative magnitude means you've chosen the wrong direction of current initially.

So what were your system of equations?
 
Wait, so if I do the systems of equations it'll just be negative?
So the current is down, but let's assume I didn't know and I just guessed that it was up.

For the right loop: 16 - I1(R2+3) + 6I2 - 4 = 0
For the left loop: 16 - I1(R2+3) - R1I1

Is this correct? Not 100% sure about the sign on the 4.00 V one. So hypothetically, let's say I got both currents from this equation. Would both of them be "right" but just negative?
 
horsedeg said:
Wait, so if I do the systems of equations it'll just be negative?
So the current is down, but let's assume I didn't know and I just guessed that it was up.

Yes, nothing more tricky about it in these cases. Assuming you set it up correctly. An intial wrong guess will give you the same magnitude of current, with the sign being negetive.

For the right loop: 16 - I1(R2+3) + 6I2 - 4 = 0
For the left loop: 16 - I1(R2+3) - R1I1

Is this correct? Not 100% sure about the sign on the 4.00 V one. So hypothetically, let's say I got both currents from this equation. Would both of them be "right" but just negative?

You have a junction, so you would need three equations for this system (there are currents ##i_1,i_2,i_3##)

Take a look at the example on Wikipedia and then try again:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirchhoff's_circuit_laws
 
Student100 said:
Yes, nothing more tricky about it in these cases. Assuming you set it up correctly. An intial wrong guess will give you the same magnitude of current, with the sign being negetive.
You have a junction, so you would need three equations for this system (there are currents ##i_1,i_2,i_3##)

Take a look at the example on Wikipedia and then try again:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirchhoff's_circuit_laws
Right, I forgot I1=I2+I3. That's just kind of in the back of my mind.

So I could use this to get ALL the values? Because on the test it wasn't working. I was doing something wrong. I was trying all these combinations of currents. Maybe I just was doing it completely wrong. Considering V in the diagram is 16V, could you confirm that I set it up right? Because if I didn't then that might be why. One thing I'm not sure about is how the sign of that voltage (4V) in the middle would change if the currents were in different directions.
 
horsedeg said:
Right, I forgot I1=I2+I3. That's just kind of in the back of my mind.

So I could use this to get ALL the values? Because on the test it wasn't working. I was doing something wrong. I was trying all these combinations of currents. Maybe I just was doing it completely wrong. Considering V in the diagram is 16V, could you confirm that I set it up right? Because if I didn't then that might be why.

So it probably didn't work out because you'd set up the system of equations wrong. I won't do it for you, but I help get you started:

28-p-021-alt_Ink_LI.jpg


In this configuration, ##i_1+i_2=i_3##, now do your loops, and ensure you're using ##i_3## for ##R_1## and the directions according to the picture.

After you've found the system, plug it into a matrix or solve the system by substitution. ##i_2## should be negative, if ##V = 16V## and ##R_1## and ##R_2## satisfy the equations in such a way that this is true.

Edit: To help further, you should get something like the sign for ##i_2## depends on ##R_2-3R_1+3## assuming I did the math right.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top