What is the Doppler coefficient and how does it affect wave frequency?

AI Thread Summary
The Doppler coefficient's sign is influenced by the fuel/core composition, determining its effect on reactivity. In systems where resonance absorption leads to more (n,γ) reactions and less fission, the Doppler coefficient is negative, as seen in light water reactors (LWRs). Conversely, if resonance absorption promotes fission over (n,γ) reactions, the coefficient can be positive. Some fast and intermediate spectrum reactors may exhibit a positive Doppler coefficient under specific configurations, which should be avoided. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for reactor safety and efficiency.
googlefans
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
hello,everybody .Doppler coefficient will be positive?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
googlefans said:
hello,everybody .Doppler coefficient will be positive?
Whether the Doppler coefficient (for resonance absorption) is positive or negative depends on the composition of the fuel/core.

If resonance absorption leads to more (n,γ) and less fission then it has a negative effect on reactivity in a critical system.

If the absorption leads to more fission and less (n,γ), then it has a positive effect.


In an LWR (water moderated reactor) the Doppler coefficient is negative. The U-238 resonances absorb neutrons more readily, and to some extent, the resonance absorption of U-235 and Pu-239 resulting in (n,γ) compete with those resulting in fission.

Some fast and intermediate spectrum reactors may have a positive Doppler coefficient with certain configurations. Such configurations are to be avoided.

References:
http://www.barc.gov.in/publications/eb/golden/reactor/toc/chapter1/1_1.pdf
http://www.inl.gov/technicalpublications/Documents/4502642.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronuc said:
Whether the Doppler coefficient (for resonance absorption) is positive or negative depends on the composition of the fuel/core.

If resonance absorption leads to more (n,γ) and less fission then it has a negative effect on reactivity in a critical system.

If the absorption leads to more fission and less (n,γ), then it has a positive effect.


In an LWR (water moderated reactor) the Doppler coefficient is negative. The U-238 resonances absorb neutrons more readily, and to some extent, the resonance absorption of U-235 and Pu-239 resulting in (n,γ) compete with those resulting in fission.

Some fast and intermediate spectrum reactors may have a positive Doppler coefficient with certain configurations. Such configurations are to be avoided.

References:
http://www.barc.gov.in/publications/eb/golden/reactor/toc/chapter1/1_1.pdf
http://www.inl.gov/technicalpublications/Documents/4502642.pdf

thank you very much
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top