What is the Doppler coefficient and how does it affect wave frequency?

AI Thread Summary
The Doppler coefficient's sign is influenced by the fuel/core composition, determining its effect on reactivity. In systems where resonance absorption leads to more (n,γ) reactions and less fission, the Doppler coefficient is negative, as seen in light water reactors (LWRs). Conversely, if resonance absorption promotes fission over (n,γ) reactions, the coefficient can be positive. Some fast and intermediate spectrum reactors may exhibit a positive Doppler coefficient under specific configurations, which should be avoided. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for reactor safety and efficiency.
googlefans
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
hello,everybody .Doppler coefficient will be positive?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
googlefans said:
hello,everybody .Doppler coefficient will be positive?
Whether the Doppler coefficient (for resonance absorption) is positive or negative depends on the composition of the fuel/core.

If resonance absorption leads to more (n,γ) and less fission then it has a negative effect on reactivity in a critical system.

If the absorption leads to more fission and less (n,γ), then it has a positive effect.


In an LWR (water moderated reactor) the Doppler coefficient is negative. The U-238 resonances absorb neutrons more readily, and to some extent, the resonance absorption of U-235 and Pu-239 resulting in (n,γ) compete with those resulting in fission.

Some fast and intermediate spectrum reactors may have a positive Doppler coefficient with certain configurations. Such configurations are to be avoided.

References:
http://www.barc.gov.in/publications/eb/golden/reactor/toc/chapter1/1_1.pdf
http://www.inl.gov/technicalpublications/Documents/4502642.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronuc said:
Whether the Doppler coefficient (for resonance absorption) is positive or negative depends on the composition of the fuel/core.

If resonance absorption leads to more (n,γ) and less fission then it has a negative effect on reactivity in a critical system.

If the absorption leads to more fission and less (n,γ), then it has a positive effect.


In an LWR (water moderated reactor) the Doppler coefficient is negative. The U-238 resonances absorb neutrons more readily, and to some extent, the resonance absorption of U-235 and Pu-239 resulting in (n,γ) compete with those resulting in fission.

Some fast and intermediate spectrum reactors may have a positive Doppler coefficient with certain configurations. Such configurations are to be avoided.

References:
http://www.barc.gov.in/publications/eb/golden/reactor/toc/chapter1/1_1.pdf
http://www.inl.gov/technicalpublications/Documents/4502642.pdf

thank you very much
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...
Back
Top