What is the electric field due to hollow sphere at R=z?

AI Thread Summary
The derived electric field E(r) for a hollow sphere with surface charge σ at a point z shows that for z > R, E(r) simplifies to E(r) = \hat{z}σR²/ε₀z², while for z < R, E(r) equals zero. At z = R, the equation becomes undefined due to a division by zero, indicating a discontinuity in the electric field at this point. Despite this, the electric field approaches a finite limit from both sides, reflecting the nature of surface charges. The discussion highlights that real-world surface charges have thickness, allowing for a continuous transition in the electric field. The potential V at z = R can still be defined despite the discontinuity in E, similar to functions with discontinuous derivatives.
flux!
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
So I derived the E-field of a hollow sphere with a surface charge σ at z and I got:

E(r)=\hat{z}\frac{\sigma R^2}{2\varepsilon _{0}z^2}\left ( \frac{R+z}{\left | R+z \right |}-\frac{R-z}{\left | R-z \right |} \right )

at z>R, the equation becomes:

E(r)=\hat{z}\frac{\sigma R^2}{\varepsilon _{0}z^2}

then at z<R:

E(r)=0

as expected.

However, the equation would explode at z=R, since the denominator of the second term in the right hand side equation becomes zero. Now, how do I get over this? and get the E-field at z=R. Any alternate solution to overcome the 0/0?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The field has a well defined finite limit from both sides. It is discontinuous at z = R, but that is expected from the surface charge.
 
A surface charge density with zero thickness is an idealization. In the real world, a surface charge always has some small thickness, and the field makes a rapid but continuous transition.
 
Also, in the idealised case, asking for the electric field at the exact point of the surface is not that different from asking about the field at the exact point of a point charge. It is not really surprising that it does not have a particular value and is discontinuous.
 
Thanks for all valuable input! Just a follow up, how do we explain the case where there is a Potential V at z=R but E is discontinuous?
 
This is no stranger than any continuous function with discontinuous derivatives, such as ##|x|##.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top