What is the electric field just at the shell?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the electric field at the surface of a uniformly charged spherical shell, specifically at the radius where the shell is located (r=R). Participants explore the implications of Gauss' Law, the idealization of a zero-thickness shell, and the behavior of electric fields in relation to shells of finite thickness.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that while the electric field inside a spherical shell is zero and outside can be treated as if all charge were at the center, the field exactly at the shell (r=R) is less clear, particularly regarding how many charges are enclosed by a Gaussian surface at that point.
  • Another participant states that there is a discontinuity in the electric field strength at the shell, arguing that a uniformly charged, infinitely thin shell is a theoretical construct and does not exist in reality due to quantum mechanical limitations on charge localization.
  • A different participant emphasizes that a zero-thickness shell is an idealization and that real shells have finite thickness, leading to a continuous variation of the electric field across the shell. They mention that this is often analyzed in exercises involving shells of finite thickness.
  • One participant expresses gratitude for the responses and indicates they have gained understanding from the discussion.
  • Another participant reiterates the idea of finite thickness and requests clarification on calculating the electric field in the case of a conducting shell, specifically in the region where the radius is between the inner and outer surfaces of the shell.
  • A later reply suggests using the integral form of Gauss's law to find the enclosed charge in different regions, indicating that participants should post their attempts in a homework forum for further assistance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the behavior of the electric field at the shell. There are competing views regarding the implications of idealizations and the physical reality of charge distribution.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations related to the idealization of a zero-thickness shell, the dependence on the definition of charge distribution, and the unresolved nature of the electric field at the shell's surface.

Isaac@
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Here's the question I am thinking about:
If there is a spherical shell with uniform charge on it, I know the electric field inside the shell is zero and that outside the shell is calculated just the same with a single charge at the center of the sphere, but how about the field just at the shell (r=R)?
I try to solve this problem by Gauss' Law. I can draw a gaussian surface just above and below the shell, but when I try to draw just at the shell, how many charges does the surface enclose? The charges are assumed to be infinitely small. When they are just at the gaussian surface, are they enclosed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Undefined. There is a discontinuity in the field strength right at the shell.

Physically, this is no problem because there is no such thing as a uniformly charged, infinitely thin spherical shell. Charge is discrete, not uniform. In addition, quantum mechanics imposes limitations on the extent to which charge can be localized to such a sharply defined shape.
 
A zero-thickness shell is an idealization. In practice any shell has a finite thickness, across which the electric field varies continuously from one side to the other. It's a common exercise to calculate the electric field for a charged spherical shell of finite thickness, inside the shell (r < a), within the thickness of the shell (a ≤ r ≤ b), and outside the shell (r > b).

Even with a conducting shell, for which all the charge resides on the surface in electrostatics, the charge layer has a small but nonzero thickness, although we usually idealize it as zero thickness. In that case the electric field is described by a step function.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Thank you for all your replies! I understand now.:smile:
 
jtbell said:
A zero-thickness shell is an idealization. In practice any shell has a finite thickness, across which the electric field varies continuously from one side to the other. It's a common exercise to calculate the electric field for a charged spherical shell of finite thickness, inside the shell (r < a), within the thickness of the shell (a ≤ r ≤ b), and outside the shell (r > b).

Even with a conducting shell, for which all the charge resides on the surface in electrostatics, the charge layer has a small but nonzero thickness, although we usually idealize it as zero thickness. In that case the electric field is described by a step function.
And can you tell me exactly how to fild field in case of a conducting shell of some thickness. specially the a<r<b case
thanks
 
Use the integral form of Gauss's law, similarly to any other spherically symmetric charge distribution. Take care to find the "enclosed charge" appropriately for r in the various regions: r < a, a < r < b, and r > b.

If you know Gauss's law but have trouble with the details, post your attempt in our Introductory Physics Homework forum and someone will probably be able to help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K