What is the Empirical Formula of a Chemical Compound Given Combustion Data?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Whalstib
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemical Formula
AI Thread Summary
To determine the empirical formula of the unknown compound from combustion data, the combustion of 35.0 mg of C-H-N produces 33.5 mg of CO2 and 41.4 mg of H2O. The calculations yield 2 moles of O, 6 moles of H, and 1 mole of C. Since nitrogen is not included in the products, its mass can be found by subtracting the combined mass of carbon and hydrogen from the total mass of the original compound. The relative amounts of C, H, and N are then used to establish the empirical formula. This method allows for the accurate determination of the empirical formula despite the absence of nitrogen in the combustion products.
Whalstib
Messages
119
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



35.0mg of C-H-N (the unknown is the empirical formula) combusts to produce 33.5mg CO2 + 41.4mg H2O

Homework Equations


I'm confused by the fact the product does not include N so I'm unsure how to figure for it.



The Attempt at a Solution


Using all the information stoichometrically I have surmised 2 mols of O, 6 mols of H, 1 mol of C.
I used the same type of equations for each ie:
.0335g CO2 (1mol CO2/1mol C 44.01g) * (2mol O/ 1 Mol CO2) = .001522

Oncea again I'm stumped on how to figure the N...

Any help appreciatted!

Warren
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't do the calculation but once you figure out how many mols of C and H you convert back to mass then add them together and find the difference from the total giving you the mass of N. Then you set up the proportions to find their relative amounts for the empirical formula (I believe you should be using the mols instead of the mass for the proportions).
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top