What is the empirical formula of this compound help?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Larrytsai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the empirical formula of a hydrated compound with a specific percentage composition of sodium, sulfur, oxygen, and water. Participants express confusion over their calculations, particularly regarding the mole ratios of the elements. One user suggests that their formula, Na2S2O3 - 5H2O, may not accurately represent the compound due to discrepancies in mole counts. Another user shares a methodical approach to converting percentages to moles, emphasizing the importance of following a systematic process. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges in deriving empirical formulas from percentage compositions.
Larrytsai
Messages
222
Reaction score
0
A hydrated substance was found to have the following percentage composition= Na 18.53%
S= 25.87%
O= 10.34%
H2O= 62.9%
What is the empirical formula of this compound?


what i got was Na2S2O3 - 5H2O
but I am confused cause Na and S are both 0.806 mols
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps, if you showed your work you might get more answers.
 
10.34/16 < 18.53/23 and 25.87/32, but you have more O atoms in your formula than Na and S. How is that? I got Na5S5O4*22H2O, but that's probably not right.
 
umm hmm i assumed 100 grams and then converted to mols
 
Use this cool poem.

Percent to mass
Mass to mole
Divide by small
Multiply 'til whole
Poem by "Joel S. Thompson"
 
MichaelXY said:
Use this cool poem.

Percent to mass
Mass to mole
Divide by small
Multiply 'til whole
Poem by "Joel S. Thompson"

That's pretty neat! I'll have to remember that.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
100
Views
12K
Replies
2
Views
14K
Back
Top