What is the empirical formula of this compound thanks?

  • Thread starter Thread starter juicy--
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Thanks
AI Thread Summary
To determine the empirical formula of the hydrated compound with the given percentage composition, convert the percentages to grams assuming a 100g sample. Next, calculate the number of moles for each element by dividing the mass by their respective molar masses. Divide each mole value by the smallest mole quantity to find the simplest ratio, and if necessary, multiply to achieve whole numbers. Special attention should be given to the water component, as it indicates the compound is a hydrate. Ensure the final empirical formula aligns with the original percentage composition for verification.
juicy--
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A hydrated substance was found to have the following percentages composition:

Na = 16.1%
C = 4.2%
O = 16.8%
H2O = 62.9%


What is the empirical formula of this compound?

------------

im really confused and don't know where to start so if someone could help itd be very much appreciated!

thank you :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a post further down on the board that addresses a problem like this. I'll copy and paste MichealXY's poem that should help:

Percent to mass,
Mass to mole,
Divide by small,
Multiply 'til whole.

Assume 100g of compound. Change % to g. Divide these masses by their molar masses to get moles. Divide each mole amount by the smallest mole quantity of the group. You'll get numbers that are either close to a whole number or close to half (such as 1.5, 2.5, etc.) multiply all of the numbers by a common factor until they are all whole numbers, and this will be the empirical formula.
 
Yes what juicy said is correct. This is obviously going to be a hydrate so it might be a little tricky figuring it out for that part. Make sure that once you "think" you have the right answer, that you check it to make sure the percentages check out correctly.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top