What Is the Entropy of a Black Hole?

AI Thread Summary
Black holes are believed to possess entropy, defined as a measure of change within a system, with their entropy related to the area of the event horizon. The formula for black hole entropy is S = 1/4 A, where A represents the area of the black hole. Black holes adhere to thermodynamic laws, suggesting their entropy behaves similarly to that of other thermodynamic systems, particularly in relation to the second law of thermodynamics. The concept of black holes having temperature, introduced by Hawking radiation, further solidified their connection to thermodynamics. Understanding black hole entropy is complex and experimental verification remains challenging, but no contradictions have been found in theoretical frameworks involving black holes.
jackle
Messages
275
Reaction score
0
Does a black hole have entropy? How do we know? What does it "do"?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
jackle said:
Does a black hole have entropy? How do we know? What does it "do"?
Everything "has entropy" at some given state or another. Entropy is not a state of being, it is a measure of a change.
Entropy is defined as the "capacity for change" of a system. If the state of a system is changed but the entropy is not changed (Del S = 0), then the process was reversible (able to be changed back to the original state without added energy). If the state of a system is changed and the entropy increases (Del S > 0), then the process was irreversible, or spontaneous. NOTICE, the Del S (change in entropy) for a state change cannot be less than zero! Since most processes are irreversible, it is said that universal entropy is always increasing - since entropy is the driving force behind equilibrium (not chaos), this means that the universe is constantly moving toward a less dynamic state.
So, the question should be whether there is a change in entropy, not just does it have entropy.
 
jackle said:
Does a black hole have entropy?

We think so, yes. In natural units, the entropy of a black hole is given simply by:

S=\frac{1}{4}A

where A is the area of the black hole:

A=\int \sqrt{g_{\theta\theta}g_{\phi\phi}}d\theta d\phi,

which is evaluated at the outer event horizon.
How do we know?

It's a long story, but the basic idea is that black holes seem to follow their own laws of thermodynamics if one makes the replacements, T -> T_{Hawking}, E -> M, and S -> A. For example, in classical theory (prior to the recognition that they could radiate), there was no way to decrease the total area of all black holes in the universe. This is like the second law of thermodynamics, which says that the total entropy of a closed system must always increase.

The recognition of these connections actually predated Hawking's realization that black holes had a temperature, so the temperature analogy was originally made to a constant quantity defined on the event horizon of the black hole. The development of the theory surrounding Hawking radiation only strengthened the connection between black holes and thermodynamics.

Initially, it was treated simply as an analogy to the laws of thermodynamics, but we now believe that the entropy I give above is the actual thermodynamic entropy of the black hole. This is difficult to test with actual experiments, but we have been unable to find any contradictions in these identities when black holes are included in thermodynamic systems.
What does it "do"?

Not quite sure what you mean here.
 
Last edited:
What does it "do"?

SpaceTiger said:
Not quite sure what you mean here.

I heard a lecturer saying that black holes were thought to be high entropy singularities and the big bang was thought to be a low entropy singularity.

I am trying to understand what difference it makes.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
49
Views
5K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Back
Top