What is the equation for high (cosmological) redshift?

AI Thread Summary
The equation for cosmological redshift is z = λobs / λemit - 1, which remains valid even at high redshifts. The Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation, observed with a redshift of about 1100, is explained by the significant shift in wavelength due to the expansion of the universe, rather than a direct correlation with lookback time. The peak wavelength of the CMB blackbody shifts from approximately 3000K at emission to around 3K today. Misunderstandings arise when assuming redshift is directly proportional to lookback time, as the relationship is more complex. A referenced paper provides detailed mathematical insights and visual representations of z versus lookback time.
JArnold
Messages
21
Reaction score
3
The equation for cosmological redshift where z << 1 is is commonly given as z = λobs / λemit -1

What is the equation for high-z, accounting for how light surpasses the spatial expansion it leaves behind, but abstracting from gravitational influences? I'm particularly interested in how CMB can be calculated to have a z of only ~1100 if it dates from 380,000 years from the start of cosmological expansion, which would indicate a z of 13,750,000,000 / 380,000 -1, or more than 36,000.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The equation z = λobs / λemit -1 is valid even at very high redshifts. So the CMB radiation has been shifted by a factor of ~1000. Since the peak wavelength of a blackbody is proportional to 1/T, this means the temperature of the CMB blackbody has also been shifted by ~1000, from ~3000K as emitted to ~3K as we see it today.

Your mistake is in assuming that the redshift is proportional to the lookback time, which isn't the case. It's just more complicated than that. This paper explains the math behind it, and Figure 6 shows a graph of z vs lookback time.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top