What Is the Equation of a Wave Reflected from a Rigid Boundary?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Amith2006
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wave Wave equation
AI Thread Summary
The equation of a wave reflected from a rigid boundary is derived from the original wave equation y = A[sin(wt – kx)]. The reflected wave is represented as y = A1[sin(wt + kx)], and there is a phase change of π when reflecting off a denser medium. The amplitude A1 is influenced by boundary conditions, which determine if a negative sign is necessary in the equation. It is confirmed that a negative sign is not required; the phase change occurs due to the properties of the rigid wall. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately describing wave behavior at boundaries.
Amith2006
Messages
416
Reaction score
2
Sir,
Consider a progressive wave represented by the equation,
y = A[sin(wt – kx)]
If it is reflected from a wall, what will probably be the equation of the reflected wave?
I think it is y = A1[sin(wt + kx)]
Is it right? Should a negative sign be given to the expression? Will there be a phase change of pi assuming the wall to be rigid boundary?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Amith2006 said:
Sir,
Consider a progressive wave represented by the equation,
y = A[sin(wt – kx)]
If it is reflected from a wall, what will probably be the equation of the reflected wave?
I think it is y = A1[sin(wt + kx)]
Is it right? Should a negative sign be given to the expression? Will there be a phase change of pi assuming the wall to be rigid boundary?

There will be a phase change of \pi if the wall is of a denser medium than the incident medium. Since the wall is rigid, this is correct. A_{1} is determined from considerations of boundary conditions. That will tell you whether there should be a minus sign or not. You don't have to "give" it a negative sign.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top