What is the Equilibrium Concentration of NO in the Reaction N2 + O2 = 2NO?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jlc287
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To find the equilibrium concentration of NO in the reaction N2 + O2 = 2NO, start by establishing the equilibrium expression based on the reaction stoichiometry. Given 10 moles of N2 and 1 mole of O2, determine the initial concentrations before the reaction shifts to equilibrium. The equilibrium constant can be expressed in terms of partial pressures, which will help in calculating the concentration of NO. It's essential to set up an ICE (Initial, Change, Equilibrium) table to track the changes in concentrations. The final goal is to calculate the concentration of NO in ppm at equilibrium.
jlc287
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
:smile: I am having trouble figuring out the equillibrium equation in ppm for the following reaction N2 + O2 = 2NO. With 10 moles of N2 and 1 mole of O2. I am having trouble figuring out how to start this problem. Can anyone give me a hint...it has been years since i tried this.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Wait, so you want to find the expression for the equilibrium constant in terms of partial pressure?
 
I'm sorry, I need to find the equlibrium concentration of NO.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top