Stargazing What is the Explanation for the SECCHI Image of Object Opening a Shield?

  • Thread starter Thread starter infinitebubble
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Image
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around an image from the SECCHI observatory showing an object that appears to open a shield, potentially capturing the Sun's energy. Some participants argue that the object is an imaging artifact caused by internal reflections, while others believe it represents a genuine phenomenon, citing its trajectory and behavior over time. The debate includes references to video playback of the object across various dates, suggesting it moves independently rather than as a reflection. Despite differing opinions, one participant insists that the object's motion aligns with expected behavior of reflections. The thread concludes with a lock, indicating no further discussion will occur.
infinitebubble
Messages
82
Reaction score
40
Saw this image of some object opening what looks like some shield to deflect or capture our Sun's energy? Not a hoax as this is captured on the HI2_SREM camera from the NAVY's SECCHI observatory. To see the image in motion click Duration: 09 days and set the HI2_SREM button and '20160823' for the date and play the video. Also see dates one month before and one month after to see the results of the video of the object in different trajectories captured. Can anyone explain what they are seeing here?

https://secchi.nrl.navy.mil/index.php?p=js_secchi_day
 

Attachments

  • SECCHI_2016_08_23.JPG
    SECCHI_2016_08_23.JPG
    50.4 KB · Views: 632
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2
I don't think so... this explanation does not refute the trajectory and opening of what looks like some sort of shield. There are other dates back in 2012 where the object is seen as a disk and then the shield is opening and then closing as the object moves away... it is not reflections or some bright source as suggested here.

Again... may I suggest you go through the various dates above and run the video playback to see the object as it moves though the medium of space while the planets of Venus and Mars are still in the frame of the playback sequences.
 
infinitebubble said:
I don't think so... this explanation does not refute the trajectory and opening of what looks like some sort of shield. There are other dates back in 2012 where the object is seen as a disk and then the shield is opening and then closing as the object moves away... it is not reflections or some bright source as suggested here.

So NASA is incorrect and/or lying to us about it being an image artifact from internal reflections in the optics? I think not.

infinitebubble said:
Again... may I suggest you go through the various dates above and run the video playback to see the object as it moves though the medium of space while the planets of Venus and Mars are still in the frame of the playback sequences.

I already ran through several months worth of images and the "object" behaves exactly as one would expect of an image artifact from internal reflections. It's motion is synced with the planet and always exactly opposite across the optical axis, exactly as reflections behave. The shield-like shape isn't even pointed at the Sun, but at the planet.

You can believe what you'd like, but there is absolutely no evidence supporting the assertion that this is anything other than internal reflections from the optics.

Thread locked.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top