What is the explanation for the sequence in the Mandl QFT textbook (p.53)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter intervoxel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Meson Propagator
intervoxel
Messages
192
Reaction score
1
Could anyone please explain the sequence below taken from Mandl QFT textbook (p.53)?

1. i\hbar c\Delta^+(x-x')=[\phi^+(x),\phi^-(x')]

2. i\hbar c\Delta^+(x-x')=\langle 0|[\phi^+(x),\phi^-(x')]|0\rangle

3. i\hbar c\Delta^+(x-x')=\langle 0|\phi^+(x)\phi^-(x')|0\rangle

4. i\hbar c\Delta^+(x-x')=\langle 0|\phi(x)\phi(x')|0\rangle

From 1. to 2. does it mean that the vacuum expected value of the commutator is the commutator itself? How?

From 2. to 3. does it mean that the term \langle 0|\phi^-(x')\phi^+(x)|0\rangle is null? How?

From 3. to 4. does it mean that the terms

\langle 0|\phi^+(x)\phi^+(x')|0\rangle

\langle 0|\phi^-(x)\phi^+(x')|0\rangle

\langle 0|\phi^-(x)\phi^-(x')|0\rangle

are all null? How?

Thank you for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes to 2, 3 and 4. φ+ is an absorption operator, so φ+|0> = 0 since there is nothing to absorb. Likewise <0|φ- = 0.
 
Thank you. What about the first transformation?
 
I don't have a copy of Mandl to compare, but I'm looking at Weinberg section 6.1 where he says something similar. He's evaluating the S-matrix as a sum of terms, <0| ... |0> where ... is a string of creation and annihilation operators, and he's talking about rearranging the order of the operators. Every time you switch the order of two of them you get a numerical factor.

And on p262 he says: (f) Pairing of a field ψ with a field adjoint ψ in H(y) yields a factor -iΔ(x,y). (I'm leaving some subscripts out.) This is close to what you're saying. So I think the context is that Mandl's Eq (1) represents a subexpression that's eventually going to be placed between <0| |0>'s.
 
To go from eq.1 to eq.2, sandwich eq.1 between <0| and |0>. Use the fact that the left side of eq.1 is just a c-number (not an operator), and so on the left we just get that function times <0|0>=1.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
932
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top