What is the Explanation for the Zero Value in the Steiner Theorem Demonstration?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding why the term 2r∫x dm equals zero in the context of the Steiner theorem demonstration. The key point is that the integral ∫x dm represents the x-coordinate of the center of mass, which is zero when the center of mass is at the origin. This is confirmed by the formula x_cm = (1/M)∫x dm, where M is the total mass. The confusion arises from not recognizing that the integral evaluates to zero due to the chosen coordinate system. Ultimately, the integration over the mass distribution leads to a null result for this term.
Telemachus
Messages
820
Reaction score
30

Homework Statement


I have a doubt about the steiner theorem demonstration, its actually trivial, but I can't realize why is this.

Lets see, the demonstration which you can see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_axis_theorem" goes as follows:

I_{cm} = \int{(x^2 + y^2)} dm

I_z = \int{((x - r)^2 + y^2)} dm

I_z = \int{(x^2 + y^2)} dm + r^2 \int dm - 2r\int{x} dm

I_z = I_{cm} + mr^2

What I need to know is why this gives zero:
2r\int{x} dm

Bye there, and thanks for your help :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Telemachus said:
What I need to know is why this gives zero:
2r\int{x} dm
Because they are using a coordinate system in which the center of mass is at the origin, so:
Xcm ≡ (∫xdm)/M = 0
 
I don't get it. I actually read that explanation before. That integral wouldn't give: 2rxM? being M the total mass...? I'm not seeing the "differential" thing and how it works to give zero, I think that's the problem. It must be like integrating over a null area, but I don't see it.
 
Telemachus said:
I don't get it. I actually read that explanation before. That integral wouldn't give: 2rxM? being M the total mass...? I'm not seeing the "differential" thing and how it works to give zero, I think that's the problem. It must be like integrating over a null area, but I don't see it.
Do you agree that the x-coordinate of the center of mass is given by:

x_{cm} = \frac{1}{M} \int x dm

where M is the total mass?
 
Right. I see it now :P thanks.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top