What is the Final Speed of the White Ball After an Elastic Collision?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the final speed of a white billiard ball after an elastic collision with a stationary black billiard ball of equal mass. The initial momentum and kinetic energy are conserved, leading to equations that incorporate the angles of deflection for both balls post-collision. The center of mass velocity is calculated, but confusion arises regarding transforming speeds back to the original frame and correctly applying the angles. A key insight is that the sum of the angles is 90°, which simplifies the problem, allowing for a more straightforward solution using trigonometric identities. The conversation highlights the importance of careful organization and understanding of the physics principles involved in elastic collisions.
Drakkith
Mentor
Messages
23,175
Reaction score
7,625

Homework Statement



billiardballsnew2.png
[/B]
A white billiard ball with mass mw = 1.53 kg is moving directly to the right with a speed of v = 3.25 m/s and collides elastically with a black billiard ball with the same mass mb = 1.53 kg that is initially at rest. The two collide elastically and the white ball ends up moving at an angle above the horizontal of θw = 51° and the black ball ends up moving at an angle below the horizontal of θb = 39°.

1) What is the final speed of the white ball?

Homework Equations


p=mv
k=0.5mv2
Vcm = (M1V1 + M2V2)/ (M1+M2)

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't really have any idea how to solve this.

I started by first finding the velocity of the center of mass:
Vcm = (M1V1 + M2V2)/ (M1+M2)
Vcm = (1.53*3.25 + 1.53*0) / (1.53 + 1.53)
Vcm = 4.9725/3.06 = 1.625 m/s

And the initial momentum: P1i = M1V1i = 1.53*3.25 = 4.97 kg*m/s

Since the collision is elastic, I know the final kinetic energy is equal to the initial, which means that K1f + K2f = K1i
K1f + K2f = 0.5M1V1i2 = 0.5(1.53)(3.252) = 8.08 J

Since momentum is conserved, I also know that the vertical momentum M1V1fy + M2V2fy = 0
And that the horizontal momentum of the two balls after the collision has to equal the initial momentum: M1V1fx + M2V2fx = 4.97 kg*m/s

In the CoM frame, the 2 balls collide and then head off at the same speed, but for the life of me I can't figure out how to transform the speed in the CoM frame (1.625 m/s for each ball) back to the original frame without knowing what angle they are moving at after the collision in the CoM frame. And I don't know how to get the angles in the CoM frame from the angles in the original frame.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Drakkith said:
Since momentum is conserved, I also know that the vertical momentum M1V1fy + M2V2fy = 0
And that the horizontal momentum of the two balls after the collision has to equal the initial momentum: M1V1fx + M2V2fx = 4.97 kg*m/s

Oh look... I see two equations with V1 and V2... I bet I can solve for V1 and V2 now... :rolleyes:
 
The problem seems to give more information than needed, which means that once you solve it you should check that all the information is consistent.

There are two unknowns: the final velocity of each ball. But there are three constraints: conservation of momentum in the x-direction, in the y-direction, and conservation of energy.

Drakkith said:
Since momentum is conserved, I also know that the vertical momentum M1V1fy + M2V2fy = 0
And that the horizontal momentum of the two balls after the collision has to equal the initial momentum: M1V1fx + M2V2fx = 4.97 kg*m/s
This is the bulk of the problem done here. All you need to do is write the x and y components in terms of the respective angles and solve. Then I would check that the collision really is elastic.

Drakkith said:
In the CoM frame, the 2 balls collide and then head off at the same speed, but for the life of me I can't figure out how to transform the speed in the CoM frame (1.625 m/s for each ball) back to the original frame without knowing what angle they are moving at after the collision in the CoM frame. And I don't know how to get the angles in the CoM frame from the angles in the original frame.
I do like the idea, but in this case it makes things considerably more difficult.
 
Drakkith said:
Oh look... I see two equations with V1 and V2... I bet I can solve for V1 and V2 now... :rolleyes:
It seems I'm late :oldshy:
 
Nathanael said:
It seems I'm late :oldshy:

I've typed up about 2-3 times more posts asking for homework help than I've actually posted. I usually get everything typed up and organized and then see some connection I didn't see on my notebook that allows me to solve it. So infuriating!
 
Drakkith said:
I've typed up about 2-3 times more posts asking for homework help than I've actually posted. I usually get everything typed up and organized and then see some connection I didn't see on my notebook that allows me to solve it. So infuriating!
Oh, I've done exactly the same thing several times myself! (Almost posted a question today and another one last night.)
It just goes to show that explaining the problem to someone else can often make you understand it better.

It also doesn't help that I'm extremely disorganized on paper o0) (I like to use every inch of space in my notebook.)
 
Anyways, I did the following to get the answer, but I in the 4th paragraph, I accidentally put 0.8V2 instead of -0.8V2, which somehow gave me the right answer. Now the math isn't working out if I keep it -0.8V2...

M1V1fy + M2V2fy = 0
M1V1fx + M2V2fx = 4.97 kg*m/s

M1(sin51*v1) + M2(sin39*V2) = 0
M1(cos51*v1) + M2(cos39*V2) = 4.97

1.2V1 + 0.96V2 = 0
0.96V1 + 1.2V2 = 4.97

1.2V1 = -0.96V2, V1 = -0.8V2 (Originally I forgot the negative and put 0.8V2, which ended up working out fine)
0.96(-0.8V2) + 1.2V2 = 4.97, 0.432V2= 4.97, V2 = 11.5 (Not correct according to my homework program)

What have I done wrong here?
 
Drakkith said:
What have I done wrong here?
One of the angles should technically be negative.

The way I think about it is just that Vwy should equal Vby in magnitude (because we already know they are opposite in direction).
So I would put: Vwy=Vby (Where both Vy's are positive.)

But your equation is: Vwy=-Vby which means one of these Vy's should be negative (because they are in opposite directions).

[The problem takes care of itself if you take one of the angles to be negative. The sin(-θ) becomes -sin(θ) and the cos(θ) in the other equation is unchanged because cos(-θ)=cos(θ)]
 
Thanks!
 
  • #10
You can also notice that 39° + 51°= 90°. You need to work with a single angle. Do the derivation symbolically and plug in the data at the end.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #11
ehild said:
You can also notice that 39° + 51°= 90°. You need to work with a single angle.

I noticed that, but I don't know what you mean when you say work with a single angle.
 
  • #12
Drakkith said:
I noticed that, but I don't know what you mean when you say work with a single angle.
sin(90-α)=cos(α) and cos(90-α)=sin(α). You can use the sine and cosine of a single angle, either 59°or 31°.
It can be shown that when one ball collides with an other one in rest, and both balls have the same mass, and the collision is elastic, the velocities after the collision enclose 90°angle, or the balls exchange their velocities. The problem is solvable because the angles were correctly given, their sum was 90°.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Oh I see. Thanks, Ehild.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Back
Top