What Is the Focal Length and Magnification in Multi-Lens Systems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sz0
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lenses Optics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the focal length and magnification of multi-lens systems. For the first problem, the equivalent focal length of the five lenses, each with a focal length of 25 and spaced 50 units apart, is confirmed to be 25. In the second problem, a light source at the focal point of a lens with a focal length of 50 results in collimated light, indicating no magnification occurs when a second lens is introduced. The complexity arises from capturing an image at the focal point of the second lens, which complicates the magnification concept. Further clarification from the instructor is suggested for deeper understanding of the second problem.
sz0
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



1)
I have five lenses with f=25 placed at distance 50 from each other, what is the focal length of this system?
2)
A light source is placed in the focal point of a lens with f=50, at d=600 a lens with f=400 is placed, at the focal point of the second lens the image is captured, what is the magnification?

Homework Equations



\frac{1}{A}+\frac{1}{B} = \frac{1}{F} is everything, I think...

The Attempt at a Solution



1) I think the light rays will converge 25 after the last lens because for lens 2 and 4: 1/-f + 1/b = 1/f → b=-∞ so the light is parallel with x-axis after these lenses. For lens 1,3,5: 1/∞ + 1/b = 1/f → b=f so the projection is in the middle and for the last lens 25 away.

2)
I'm thinking the light is parallel to x-axis after the first lens because 1/f +1/b =1/f →
b=∞ and then for the second lens 1/∞ + 1/b = 1/f → image in f, so no magnification has occured.

------
It's not certain both of my solutions are wrong, but probably both are :(.
If someone has a link to info about how to calculate lens after lens that would be great, I can't goggle it since I don't know what this sort of problem is called and my book is terrible.no help.

I am very happy for any help I can get, so thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) Seems okay. If you wanted to do this generally you could use ray matrices.

2) Yeah, if I read it right, I agree here too.
 
First; thank you for looking at my problems. But I did these 2 problems + 2 other and was told 3 out of 4 were wrong so both solutions can't be correct.
 
Well, I didn't fully understand your response to question 1, but the equivalent focal length is definitely 25, which is what you got.

I think you are right about Q2 too. A point source in the focal point of an ideal lens will give collimated light. So at this point you could put another lens at the end of a football field, and you'd get the same thing. The weird thing about this question is that it an image is captured at the focal point of the second lens. The other weird thing is that in technical terms a point source is a delta function, a point that is infinitely narrow, so it doesn't really even make sense to talk about it's magnification.

Maybe you can get some elaboration from your teacher on problem two, and I could help once I know what he/she wants.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top