What Is the Focusing Range for a 45 mm Lens on an SLR Camera?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the focusing range for a 45 mm lens on a 35 mm SLR camera, specifically for distances from infinity to 1.4 m. Using the thin-lens formula, it is established that the lens must move from 45 mm to approximately 46.49 mm to achieve this focus range. A participant seeks clarification on how to handle the concept of infinity in the lens equation, realizing that 1/∞ effectively approaches zero. The conversation highlights that 1/∞ can be interpreted as negligible, simplifying the equation. Overall, the key takeaway is understanding how to apply the thin-lens formula in practical scenarios involving varying object distances.
HenryHH
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a 35 mm single lens reflex camera (SLR) the distance from the lens to the film is varied in order to focus on objects at varying distances. Over what range must a lens of 45 mm focal length vary if the camera is to be able to focus on objects ranging in distance from infinity down to 1.4 m from the camera?

Homework Equations



1/f = 1/p +1/q

The Attempt at a Solution



First, the thin-lens formula is applied for the case of focusing on objects at a distance of infinity:

1/45 = 1/∞ + 1/q
q = 45 mm

Then, the same formula is applied for the case of focusing on objects at a distance of 1.4 mm:

1/45 = 1/1400 + 1/q
q = 46.49 mm

Therefore, the range of movement is 46.49 - 45 = 1.49 mm.

I actually had help from a tutor with solving this problem. I understand the problem itself, but what I don't understand is how q = 45 was derived from the equation 1/45 = 1/∞ + 1/q since the equation contains ∞ as a variable.

Generally speaking, how do you solve equations with infinity (∞) as one of the variables? I am really stumped...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1/∞ is a very tiny number, called zero. :smile:

So 1/p = 1/q, giving p=q
 
OH... so 1/infinity basically just cancels out, then? Duh... thanks!
 
HenryHH said:
OH... so 1/infinity basically just cancels out, then? Duh... thanks!
I wouldn't use the phrase "cancels out".
mVVtk.gif
 Perhaps "fades away", "disappears", or "vanishes", would be appropriate though.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top