What is the gradient vector problem for a function with dependent variables?

evo_vil
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If z = f(x,y) such that x = r + t and y = e^{rt}, then determine \nabla f(r,t)

Homework Equations



\nabla f(x,y) = <f_x,f_y>

The Attempt at a Solution



Now if i follow this the way i think it should be done then i find the partials of f wrt x and y and then simply sub in r and t in the place of x and y respectively...

But if i get del f the normal way i get:

\nabla f = <f_x+f_y t e^{rt},f_x+f_y r e^{rt}>

is this the final/correct answer or am i missing a trick question where i was asked to find del f(r,t) and not del f(x,y)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to FP, evo_vil! :smile:

Your problem is ambiguous.
If I take it very literal, the answer would be:
\nabla f(r,t)=<f_x(r,t), f_y(r,t)>

However, I can't imagine that this was intended.

I expect that you're supposed to take the gradient from a function f* defined by:
f*(r,t) = f(x(r,t), y(r,t)).
It is not unusual that this function f* is simply called f, although that is ambiguous.

This is what you calculated, and no doubt correct.
 
Thanks!

Ive browsed PF for quite a few years, but never participated, so thanks for the welcome...

I think I am just going to go with what I've calculated and see how it goes...
Maybe see if other people get the same thing.

Thanks for your help
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top