What is the Horizontal Speed of the Second Fragment After the Shell Explodes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shimizua
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Horizontal Speed
AI Thread Summary
A 14.0-kg shell is fired at a 27-degree angle with a muzzle velocity of 160.0 m/s, and at the peak of its trajectory, it explodes into two equal fragments. One fragment falls vertically with a speed of zero, while the other fragment's horizontal speed needs to be determined. The discussion emphasizes that at the top of the trajectory, the kinetic energy is converted into potential energy, and the remaining kinetic energy will dictate the horizontal speed of the second fragment. It is noted that using conservation of momentum is more appropriate than energy conservation for this explosion scenario. The key takeaway is that the horizontal velocity of the second fragment can be calculated without needing to find the height of the trajectory.
shimizua
Messages
99
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 14.0-kg shell is fired from a gun with a muzzle velocity 160.0 m/s at 27.0o above the horizontal. At the top of the trajectory, the shell explodes into two fragments of equal mass. One fragment, whose speed immediately after the explosion is zero, falls vertically. What is the horizontal speed of the other fragment?


Homework Equations


The velocity is 160/s at an angle of 27deg - velocity must always have a speed and direction.
That's equivalent to 260 sin(27) vertically and 160 cos(27) horizontally. You can see this if you draw a triangle.

A nice feature about physics is that you can treat forces at right angles independantly so we can ignore the horizontall bit fro now and just look at the vertical.
It starts off going up at 125sin(33) and slows down at 9.8m/s^2
v^2 = u^2 + 2 a s At the top when u=0 and a = -9.8
160sin() ^2 = 2 * 9.8 * s where s (the height) = 164.31

The kinetic energy is = 1/2 m v^2 and potential energy is = m g h
At the top of the curve you have used up some of the initial KE as PE - so we now work out how much KE is left.
KE = 1/2m v^2 - mgh = 1/2* M * 160^2 - M * 9.8 * 164.31 = M ( 1/2*160^2 - 9.8*164.31).

Now the shell is only moving horizontally at the top of the curve so all this kinetic energy is going to go into the horizontal velocity.
But the mass has just halved - so:

M * those numbers = 1/2 1/2 M V^2 where V is the new velocity.


The Attempt at a Solution


so i tried doing this and it came up wrong. i saw that someone had already asked this question before but i don't know what i am doing wrong. i also just tried doing m1v1=m2v2 and that was wrong also
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi CzarValvador! :smile:

i] You didn't need to caclulate h … your KE + PE equation gives you V without it. :wink:
shimizua said:
Now the shell is only moving horizontally at the top of the curve so all this kinetic energy is going to go into the horizontal velocity …

ii] An explosion is a collision in reverse.

Collisions are not elastic unless the question says so.

(and explosions go BANG!, so they can't conserve energy, can they?)

So forget energy, and use something else. :wink:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top