What Is the Impact of Friction on Acceleration in a Dual-Mass Pulley System?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the dynamics of a dual-mass pulley system where two blocks of equal mass are connected. The primary confusion arises from the conditions under which one mass can move upward while the other moves downward, despite their equal weights. Participants emphasize the importance of drawing free body diagrams and applying Newton's second law to analyze the forces acting on each mass. The calculations reveal that the acceleration of the system is influenced by friction and the gravitational components acting on the masses. Ultimately, understanding the interplay of forces is crucial for accurately determining the system's behavior under different conditions.
Strawer
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two blocks with equal masses m1=m2=5kg are connected via a pulley, as shown. Take \mu = 0.25. Find the acceleration given that a) m1 is moving down, b)m1 is moving up. If m2=6 kg for what values of m1 will the pair move att constant speed?

Homework Equations



F=ma, f=\muN

The Attempt at a Solution



I've managed to solve a) and c) but not b).
I don't understand how m1 can be moving up, since m1=m2 and the force m2 affects m1 with is sin(37)*m2g < m1g.
If m1 is moving up doesn't that mean that it will not affect the other mass? I mean shouldn't the tension on m2 be zero? If so then we have \SigmaF=5*9.8*sin(37)-0.25*9.8*cos(37)*5=19.7
Which gives a=19.7/5=3.94 m/s^2 However it should be 2.94 m/s^2 according to the answer sheet.
 

Attachments

  • particle dynamics.png
    particle dynamics.png
    5.2 KB · Views: 461
Physics news on Phys.org
Strawer said:
I don't understand how m1 can be moving up, since m1=m2 and the force m2 affects m1 with is sin(37)*m2g < m1g.

No. I highly recommend that you draw a free body diagram for m2, and then another free body diagram for m1. Apply Newton's 2nd law, namely that ƩF = ma. You should be able to solve for a. It doesn't matter that it is impossible for m2 to pull m1 up by gravity alone. All that matters is that you're told that right now m2 happens to be moving down the incline, while m1 is moving upward. These are the initial conditions you've been given. (Maybe somebody applied a force to make this happen. Who cares? It doesn't matter, just accept this as the initial condition).

Indeed, if you choose the "down the incline" direction to be positive in your force balance equations for m2, you'll find that you get a negative value for a, meaning that although m2 is presently moving down the incline, its acceleration points up the incline, meaning that it is slowing down and will eventually reverse direction.

Strawer said:
If m1 is moving up doesn't that mean that it will not affect the other mass? I mean shouldn't the tension on m2 be zero?

No, the fact that m1 is moving up doesn't mean that the rope is going slack. As I said before, it means that m2 is moving down the incline while m1 moves upward (and the rope remains taut).
 
cepheid said:
No. I highly recommend that you draw a free body diagram for m2, and then another free body diagram for m1. Apply Newton's 2nd law, namely that ƩF = ma. You should be able to solve for a. It doesn't matter that it is impossible for m2 to pull m1 up by gravity alone. All that matters is that you're told that right now m2 happens to be moving down the incline, while m1 is moving upward. These are the initial conditions you've been given. (Maybe somebody applied a force to make this happen. Who cares? It doesn't matter, just accept this as the initial condition).

Indeed, if you choose the "down the incline" direction to be positive in your force balance equations for m2, you'll find that you get a negative value for a, meaning that although m2 is presently moving down the incline, its acceleration points up the incline, meaning that it is slowing down and will eventually reverse direction.



No, the fact that m1 is moving up doesn't mean that the rope is going slack. As I said before, it means that m2 is moving down the incline while m1 moves upward (and the rope remains taut).

Experience tells me that if I would give m1 a push the rope would go slack. Or is that because i accelerate it? Also wouldn't the rope go slack if v1 > v2 because s=vt and if the rope is taut then s1=s2?

Anyways, new try
ƩF=ma

The relevant forces acting on m2 is

friction, f=0.25*cos(37)*5*9.8
Tension T=5*9.8
Gravitational component, Fx=sin(37)*5*9.8

And so
f-Fx+T=ma
a=(0.25*cos(37)*5*9.8-sin(37)*5*9.8+5*9.8)/10=2.93 m/s^2
 
Strawer said:
Experience tells me that if I would give m1 a push the rope would go slack. Or is that because i accelerate it?

That's true. An example of the adage, "you can't push on a rope." However, nobody is saying that you (or anyone else) is pushing on m1. All that is being said is that, presently, m1 is moving upwards, whilst m2 is simultaneously moving down the ramp. That's it. Do you understand?

Yeah, that's right. I busted out a "whilst." :smile:

Strawer said:
Also wouldn't the rope go slack if v1 > v2 because s=vt and if the rope is taut then s1=s2?

Once again, you're not wrong. Any upward advancement of m1 must be accompanied by an advancement of m2 down the ramp by an equal distance. That, in fact, is precisely what is happening (i.e. this is the situation you are asked to consider). It's just the exact reverse of what happens when m1 falls down, and m2 consequently gets pulled up the ramp. The difference is that the latter situation can happen spontaneously, while the former cannot.

Strawer said:
Anyways, new try
ƩF=ma

The relevant forces acting on m2 is

friction, f=0.25*cos(37)*5*9.8
Tension T=5*9.8

This part in red is not correct. If the tension were just equal to the weight, then the net force on m1 would be zero, and it would have zero acceleration. However, if m1 had 0 acceleration, then the whole system would have zero acceleration. It doesn't.

To get T, you need to do the force balance for m1, which tells you that T - mg = ma.

Strawer said:
Gravitational component, Fx=sin(37)*5*9.8

And so
f-Fx+T=ma
a=(0.25*cos(37)*5*9.8-sin(37)*5*9.8+5*9.8)/10=2.93 m/s^2

It's a fluke that you got the right answer here. You made a second mistake that negated the first one that I mentioned above (in red). Your second mistake was to assume that the 'm' in the ma term was the total system mass. However, since the force balance equation you wrote above was for m2 only, it should be that m = 5 kg, not 10 kg.

Without this second mistake, you see that your answer is too large by a factor of 2.

Also, I'd really recommend keeping everything algebraic, until the last possible step, and not plug in numbers until you've simplified things as much as possible. If you'd done that, you'd have seen that 'm' canceled from both sides of the equation, making it unnecessary to plug in the 5 kg. Furthermore, you'd see that g factors out of every term on the left-hand side.

Anyway, if you correct your first mistake (the one in red) then you'll have this problem nailed.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top