Strawer said:
Experience tells me that if I would give m1 a push the rope would go slack. Or is that because i accelerate it?
That's true. An example of the adage, "you can't push on a rope." However,
nobody is saying that you (or anyone else) is pushing on m
1. All that is being said is that, presently, m
1 is moving upwards, whilst m
2 is simultaneously moving down the ramp. That's it. Do you understand?
Yeah, that's right. I busted out a "whilst."
Strawer said:
Also wouldn't the rope go slack if v1 > v2 because s=vt and if the rope is taut then s1=s2?
Once again, you're not wrong. Any upward advancement of m
1 must be accompanied by an advancement of m
2 down the ramp by an equal distance. That, in fact, is
precisely what is happening (i.e. this is the situation you are asked to consider). It's just the exact reverse of what happens when m
1 falls down, and m
2 consequently gets pulled up the ramp. The difference is that the latter situation can happen spontaneously, while the former cannot.
Strawer said:
Anyways, new try
ƩF=ma
The relevant forces acting on m2 is
friction, f=0.25*cos(37)*5*9.8
Tension T=5*9.8
This part in red is not correct. If the tension were just equal to the weight, then the net force on m
1 would be zero, and it would have zero acceleration. However, if m
1 had 0 acceleration, then the whole system would have zero acceleration. It doesn't.
To get T, you need to do the force balance for m
1, which tells you that T - mg = ma.
Strawer said:
Gravitational component, Fx=sin(37)*5*9.8
And so
f-Fx+T=ma
a=(0.25*cos(37)*5*9.8-sin(37)*5*9.8+5*9.8)/10=2.93 m/s^2
It's a fluke that you got the right answer here. You made a second mistake that negated the first one that I mentioned above (in red). Your second mistake was to assume that the 'm' in the ma term was the total system mass. However, since the force balance equation you wrote above was for m
2 only, it should be that m = 5 kg, not 10 kg.
Without this second mistake, you see that your answer is too large by a factor of 2.
Also, I'd really recommend keeping everything algebraic, until the last possible step, and not plug in numbers until you've simplified things as much as possible. If you'd done that, you'd have seen that 'm' canceled from both sides of the equation, making it unnecessary to plug in the 5 kg. Furthermore, you'd see that g factors out of every term on the left-hand side.
Anyway, if you correct your first mistake (the one in red) then you'll have this problem nailed.