What Is the Induced Metric on a Spacelike Hypersurface t=const?

Xander314
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let g_{\mu\nu} be a static metric, \partial_t g_{\mu\nu}=0 where t is coordinate time. Show that the metric induced on a spacelike hypersurface t=\textrm{const} is given by
<br /> \gamma_{ij} = g_{ij} - \frac{g_{ti} g_{tj}}{g_{tt}} .<br />

Homework Equations


Let y^i be the coordinates on the hypersurface and x^\mu the spacetime coordinates. The induced metric on a generic hypersurface defined by the embedding x^\mu = X^\mu(y^i) is given by
<br /> \gamma_{ij} = g_{\mu\nu} \partial_i X^\mu \partial_j X^\nu .<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


I really don't see how this can work. Since it is a hypersurface of constant coordinate time, the embedding is given by X^\mu = (t_0, X^i) so that \partial_i X^\mu = (0,\partial_i X^j). Then it immediately follows that
<br /> \gamma_{ij} = g_{kl} \partial_i X^k \partial_j X^l .<br />
There are no g_{ti} cross terms in my answer, nor is it clear to me that \partial_i X^k=\delta_i{}^k. What am I doing wrong?
 
Xander314 said:
What am I doing wrong?

The definition of the induced metric is ##\gamma_{ab} = g_{\mu\nu}\frac{\partial x^{\mu}}{\partial Y^a}\frac{\partial x^{\nu}}{\partial Y^b}## where ##x^{\mu}## are coordinates on space-time and ##Y^a## are coordinates on the hypersurface.
The embedding is ##Y^a = Y^a(x^{\mu})##. So you are doing the differentiation incorrectly.

Here is a very simple example to get you started. Let's compute the induced metric on a 2-sphere in ##\mathbb{R}^3##. The coordinates on the 2-sphere are ##(\theta,\phi)## and the embedding map is ##x = R\sin\theta\cos\phi, y = R\sin\theta\sin\phi, z = R\cos\theta##. Hence \gamma_{\theta\theta} = g_{xx}\frac{\partial x}{\partial \theta}\frac{\partial x}{\partial \theta} + g_{yy}\frac{\partial y}{\partial \theta}\frac{\partial y}{\partial \theta} + g_{zz}\frac{\partial z}{\partial \theta}\frac{\partial z}{\partial \theta} = R^2 \cos^2\theta \cos^2\phi + R^2 \cos^2\theta \sin^2\phi + R^2 \cos^2\theta = R^2 and \gamma_{\phi\phi} = g_{xx}\frac{\partial x}{\partial \phi}\frac{\partial x}{\partial \phi} + g_{yy}\frac{\partial y}{\partial \phi}\frac{\partial y}{\partial \phi} + g_{zz}\frac{\partial z}{\partial \phi}\frac{\partial z}{\partial \phi} = R^2 \sin^2\theta \sin^2 \phi + R^2 \sin^2\theta\cos^2 \phi = R^2 \sin^2 \theta A similar calculation shows that ##\gamma_{\theta\phi} = 0##.
 
  • Like
Likes micromass
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top