What is the Infinity Norm & Why Use It?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alecrimi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinity Norm
AI Thread Summary
The infinity norm, denoted as ||x||_∞, is defined as the maximum absolute value among the components of a vector. It is a valid norm because it is positive, equaling zero only when the vector is the zero vector, and it satisfies the triangle inequality. The connection between the name "infinity" and the definition as "maximum" arises from considering the limit of other norms (like one-norm and two-norm) as the exponent approaches infinity. This limit effectively highlights the largest component of the vector, reinforcing the concept of the maximum. Understanding this relationship clarifies why the infinity norm is defined in this manner.
alecrimi
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hi
I was wondering about the meaning of the infinity norm
|| x ||_\inf= max\{|x_1|, |x_2|...|x_n| \}

if a norm is a function that assigns a strictly positive length or size to all vectors in a vector space, why do we assign the maximum (or sup) as the value of this norm ?
It must be a very basic or obvious answer because I cannot find in any text.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure of exactly what you're asking alerimi.

It is positive (and zero only when the entire vector is identically zero). It's very easy to show that it satisfies the triangle inequality. Exactly what problem do you have with it's use as a norm?
 
why is it defined by "max" ?
 
alecrimi said:
why is it defined by "max" ?

Do you mean in the sense of limit of the sequence one-norm, two-norm etc?

Ok I think that must be what you're asking, what is the connection between infinity in the name and maximum in the definition.

There are a family of norms,

|| x ||_1 = |x_1| + |x_2| + ... |x_n|
|| x ||_2 = \left( |x_1|^2 + |x_2|^2 + ... |x_n|^2 \right)^{\frac{1}{2}}
|| x ||_p = \left( |x_1|^p + |x_2|^p + ... |x_n|^p \right)^{\frac{1}{p}}

Imagine that you take the limit as p goes to infinity. Factor out the largest |x_i| and then the i-th element becomes unity, while the all other elements are (magnitude) less than one. Think about what happens as you take the p-th power of each element now (as p -> infinity). That's an oversimplification, but hopefully it let's you see how it works.
 
Last edited:
yes, it was that. I thought it was something like that. Thanks
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
125
Views
19K
Back
Top