What is the Initial Angular Acceleration of a Pivoted Rod with Hanging Masses?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the initial angular acceleration of a pivoted rod with two hanging masses. The rod, measuring 2.4 m in length, has masses of 2.3 kg and 3.1 kg attached to its ends. Participants clarify the use of rotational inertia formulas and emphasize the importance of calculating torque using the weights of the masses and their distances from the pivot. The net torque is determined by subtracting the torque from the lighter mass from that of the heavier mass. The final calculation yields an angular acceleration of approximately 1.2 rad/s², with considerations for the direction of torque.
chowyo123
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
A rod of length 2.4 m is pivoted at its center and masses of 2.3 kg and 3.1 kg are hung from its two ends. Find the initial angular acceleration of the rod when the system is released from a starting position of the rod that is horizontal.

The radius of the rod would be r=1/2(2.4).. which is 1.2.

Should I use the equation I=mr^2 or I=1/12ml^2? I=mr^2 is I=(2.3)(1.2)^2=3.312 and I=(3.1)(1.2)^2=4.464. I=1/12ml^2 is I=1/12(2.3)(2.4)^2=1.104 and I=1/12(3.1)(2.4)^2=1.488. Do i even need these for this problem?

Where do i go next?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use Newton's 2nd law for rotational motion: \tau = I \alpha, where I is the total rotational inertia.

What's the mass of the rod?
 
I=(2.3)(1.2)^2= 3.312
I=(3.1)(1.2)^2= 4.464

3.312+4.464= 7.776. = I..

is this right so far?
 
Is the rod assumed to be massless? It looks like you are on the right track, and now find the torque. I'd suggest, this time, doing all the algebra before you put in the numbers.
 
The problem doesn't state the mass of the rod, just the masses on both ends.
How do i find the torque if I've only got the inertia?
 
The torque is caused by the weight of the hanging masses. Use the usual formula for finding torque.
 
Yeah, the usual formula of \tau_\textit{net} = FR_1 + FR_2 where the force would be the force of gravity and r the distance from the pivot to the perpindicular force (half the length of the rod).
 
Last edited:
so Tnet = (9.8 x 2.3)(1.2)+(9.8 x 3.1)(1.2)?

Tnet=F(m*a)R1+F(m*a)R2?
 
Last edited:
One torque is clockwise; one counter-clockwise. They have different signs.
 
  • #10
so \tau_\textit{net} = FR_1 + FR_2 was not right?
 
  • #11
chowyo123 said:
so \tau_\textit{net} = FR_1 + FR_2 was not right?

Yes, but you need to change the signs:

\tau_\textit{net} = F_1R_1 - F_2R_2

You have to subtract the torque caused by the lesser mass because it works in the opposite direction (like Doc said).

I added the subscripts to F because they're two different forces.
 
  • #12
So:
Tnet = (9.8 x 3.1)(1.2)-(9.8 x 2.3)(1.2)= 9.408? What's next?

\tau = I \alpha

\ 9.408=7.776\alpha ??
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Well, yeah, it was plus a negative torque, which you could just write as minus.

Yes, that should give the right answer when you divide.
 
  • #14
angular acceleration= 1.2 rad/s^2
 
  • #15
Yeah, depending on what convention they wanted you to use for positive or negative torque then the sign will be different. But, it doesn't look like they ever told you what weight was on which end, so you are probably fine.
 
  • #16
ok, thanks for the help, I appreciate it much.
 
Back
Top