What is the intensity of light after removing the second polarizer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter srwilliams444
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Polarization
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the intensity of light after removing the second polarizer in a stack of three polarizing filters. Initially, the intensity of unpolarized light is 75.0 W/cm² after passing through the filters. The key equation used is I=Imaxcos²(θ), which describes how the intensity changes based on the angle between the polarizers. There is confusion regarding whether the light passes through the filters multiple times and how to accurately calculate the intensity after the removal of the second polarizer. Clarification is needed on the sequence of intensity changes and the effects of removing the second filter on the overall light intensity.
srwilliams444
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Three polarizing filters are stacked, with the polarizing axis of the second and third filters at 23.0° and 62.0°, respectively, to that of the first. If unpolarized light is incident on the stack, the light has intensity 75.0 W/cm^2 after it passes through the stack. If the incident intensity is kept constant, what is the intensity of the light after it has passed through the stack if the second polarizer is removed?

Homework Equations


I=Imaxcos2(θ)


The Attempt at a Solution



I don't understand what the question is asking. Is the light passing through multiple times? And if it is, wouldn't it just be 75(cos262°)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When the light reaches the third filter, intensity of the light is not 75 W/cm^2.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top