What is the Interaction Hamiltonian in Quantum Mechanics?

The thinker
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Write out:

H_{SE}(\left|\right\beta,i_{\beta}\rangle\otimes\left|\right e_{j}\rangle)

and

exp(-iH_{SE}t)(\left|\right\beta,i_{\beta}\rangle\otimes\left|\right e_{j}\rangle)


Where:

H_{SE}=\sum_{\alpha,j}\gamma(\alpha,j)P^{(\alpha)}\otimes\left|e_{j}\right\rangle\left\langle e_{j}\right|

and

P^{(\alpha)}=\sum_{i_{\alpha}}\left|i_{\alpha}\right\rangle\left\langle i_{\alpha}\right|


(\left|i_{\alpha}\right\rangle can be written \left|\right\alpha,i_{\alpha}\rangle where alpha is a quantum number indexed by i_{\alpha} )

The Attempt at a Solution



For the first part I'm fairly sure it comes out as:

\sum_{\beta,j}\gamma(\beta,j)\left|\right\beta,i_{\beta}\rangle\otimes\left|\right e_{j}\rangle


But the second part I am not sure of, is it something like:

(Cos(t)-i\gamma(\alpha,j)Sin(t))(\left|\right\beta,i_{\beta}\rangle\otimes\left|\right e_{j}\rangle)


Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the first you should not summate over j (and you need to explain why ;))

For the second you first apply the Taylor expansion for the exponential. After that, compute:

H_{SE}^2 followed by generalizing this to H_{SE}^n.
 
Thanks for that.

I'll have a bash at that.. although I honestly can't see why you wouldn't sum over j
 
Oh wait... is it because the e_{j} basis correspond to different alpha's but not i's?

Edit: Actually on second thought that doesn't make sense because we are summing over alpha(beta).
 
Can anyone else offer some more help?

-I've been teaching myself dirac notation as part of my project this year. This is the first time I've looked at interaction Hamiltonians.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top