What is the Interpretation of Log Likelihood in Molecular Data Analysis?

Phaso
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am a Bio informatician and encountered Likelihood while executing the Molecular data. I have used one software that is using the Hidden Markov Model in addition to the EM Algorithm and Viterbi algorithm. After calculations are done already, in addition to the output, it is giving me some logL values.

The logL values are like below:

logL = -484.1534290649416

I just want to know how it is inferred? If it is very low in negative then the executed output is better or not? I have read some articles about log likelihood but they only explained about the whole likelihood process.

Note: There is no graph. It is only showing the logL values.

Good Day!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I found it... :)

Thanks!
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top