What is the inverse Fourier transform of e^{-|x|}?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the inverse Fourier transform of the function f(x) = e^{-|x|}. The Fourier transform is established as \hat f(\omega) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}}\frac{1}{1+\omega^2}, and the inverse transform is stated to be \hat \hat f(-x) = e^{-|x|}. The user seeks assistance in calculating the integral \sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \pi}} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{1}{1+t^2} e^{i \omega t} dt, expressing difficulty with traditional methods. A solution is suggested using complex contour integration and the residue theorem, which involves integrating along a closed contour in the complex plane. The conversation concludes with acknowledgment of the suggested method and a commitment to work through the solution.
MrSeaman
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I got an exam in calculus in a few weeks, and lots of questions coming up. Here's one of them:

We learned that the Fourier Transform of

f(x) = e^{-|x|}
is
\hat f(\omega) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}}\frac{1}{1+\omega^2}

I've got no problem with this one. Now, since \hat f(\omega) is Lebesgue - integrable, the inverse Fourier transform exists and should be

\hat \hat f(-x) = e^{-|x|}

To show this the 'hard way', I want to calculate the integral

\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \pi}} \int \limits_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{1}{1+t^2} e^{i \omega t} \mathrm{d} t

Well, I just don't know how to do this one. Partial Integration doesn't seem to work, and I can't find neither a good substition nor a clever use of Fubini's Theorem.

Would be thankful for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have never seen it derived directly. However, it is easily found in a table of definite integrals.
 
MrSeaman said:
To show this the 'hard way', I want to calculate the integral

\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \pi}} \int \limits_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{1}{1+t^2} e^{i \omega t} \mathrm{d} t

One way to do this is by using complex contour integration and the residue theorem.

Integrate

\int \frac{1}{1+z^2} e^{i \omega z} \mathrm{d} t

along the closed contour that consists of the portion of the real axis from -R to R together with a closing counterclockwise semicircle of radius R in the upper halfplane. Let R\rightarrow \infty. Then:the closed contour encloses a pole at z=i; the contibution from the semicircle goes to zero.

Repeat for a clockwise semicircle in the lower halfplane.

Regards,
George
 
Last edited:
As I was just told, it seems to be done by using the residue theorem of complex analysis.

edit: George was faster, thanks! Working it out...
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top