What is the Ito-Doeblin Formula?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BWV
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
BWV
Messages
1,577
Reaction score
1,930
Reading through a proof on why the higher order terms vanish and it makes this statement

dW(t)dW(t) = dt

where W(t) is a Brownian motion

It is not obvious to me why this is the case, but the text seems to infer that it is because no further explanation is offered
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It may have to do with W_t=\sqrt{t} B where B is N(0,1).
 
\delta W_t \sim N(0,t). It follows that E[(\delta W_t)^2]=\delta t and E[|\delta W_t|^3]={\rm const}\times \delta t^{3/2}. So third and higher powers of dW are smaller order than dt on average , and therefore vanish if you sum them over a partition and let dt->0.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top