What is the Likelihood of a Feeder Cord Breaking?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kaspis245
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conceptual
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the likelihood of a cord breaking when subjected to different types of pulls: a slow continuous pull versus a sudden downward pull. Participants argue that the forces acting on the cord remain the same in both scenarios, leading to the conclusion that the likelihood of snapping is equal. However, the conversation shifts to exploring the effects of static friction and the mass of the object being pulled, suggesting that pulling a heavier object may require more force, potentially increasing the risk of breaking the cord. The analogy of pulling a box across a slippery surface illustrates the nuances of force application and material response. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the complexities of force dynamics in relation to cord integrity.
kaspis245
Messages
189
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


3. A bird feeder of large mass is hung from a tree limb.
A cord attached to the bottom of the feeder has
been left dangling free. Curiosity gets the best of a child, who
pulls on the dangling cord in an attempt to see what's in the
feeder. The dangling cord is cut from the same source as the cord
attached to the limb. ls the cord between the feeder and the limb
more likely to snap with a slow continuous pull or a sudden down-
ward pull? Give your reasoning.

Homework Equations


-

The Attempt at a Solution


I think that likelihood for the cord to snap is the same, because the forces acting on the cord are the same in both ways.

What do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider a simpler situation first. Suppose a heavy box sits on a slippery surface and you pull the box across the surface with a string as shown. To avoid breaking the string, should you pull slowly or snap the string quickly? Why does it make a difference?
 

Attachments

  • Pull box.png
    Pull box.png
    2.2 KB · Views: 474
My experience tells me that I would pull the string slowly, but I can't prove why. Maybe it has something to do with static frictional force?
 
kaspis245 said:
My experience tells me that I would pull the string slowly, but I can't prove why. Maybe it has something to do with static frictional force?
There is no friction. What if you considered the case where the box on the slippery surface is made of solid lead and the case where the box is made of styrofoam? In which case would it be harder to break the string? Why?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top