What is the limit as n approaches infinity for (1 + \frac{1}{n+1}) ^ {3-n}?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shan
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The limit as n approaches infinity for the expression (1 + 1/(n+1))^(3-n) can be evaluated by rewriting it in terms of a new variable, m, where n = m - 1. This transformation leads to the expression (1 + 1/m)^(2-m), which can be simplified using exponent rules. The limit ultimately resolves to 1/e as m approaches infinity. Initial assumptions about the limit being 1 were incorrect, and the correct value is approximately 0.3679. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly applying limit properties and exponent rules in evaluating such expressions.
shan
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
It seems to an area I'm really fuzzy on. Anyway, the question I've having problems with is

lim as n->infinity<br /> (1 + \frac{1}{n+1}) ^ {3-n}<br />

At first, I thought I could evaluate the stuff inside the bracket first and then take care of the power ie

lim as n->infinity<br /> (1 + \frac{1}{n+1})<br /> = 1

so lim as n->infinity<br /> (1 + \frac{1}{n+1}) ^ {3-n} = 1 ^ {3-n} = 1<br />

But that's not right... (I drew up a graph and did some calculations, it's supposed to be 0.36-something)

Then I thought I could make it equal to
e^{lim (3-n)ln\frac{n+2}{n+1}}
so I could get rid of the (3-n) power, but then I would end up with infinity * 0 on top of the e.

A clue as to what I should be doing please? ^^ Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First I would change the variable from n to m-1. If m goes to infinity, n does as well, so you'll get the same limit. Then, do you know the formula for e? See if you can put this in a similar form.
 
use exponent rules to reduce the original expression. X^{a+b}= X^a X^b and then try it.
 
Ok using what both of you said...

if n = m-1

(1 + \frac{1}{m}) ^ {2-m}

and using an exponent rule to get

\frac {(1 + \frac{1}{m}) ^ 2}{(1 + \frac{1}{m}) ^ m}
= \frac {1}{e}

... which seems to be the answer... thanks very much StatusX and Gale17 :)
 
oops sorry, I'm missing the lim as m->infinity signs...

well if you put those in, it makes sense :)
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top