MHB What is the linear speed of Santa Fe around the earth's axis in mi/hr

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the linear speed of Santa Fe as it rotates around the Earth's axis. Santa Fe's latitude is approximately 33.88 degrees north, and the Earth's radius at the equator is 3960 miles. To find the linear speed, one must determine the radius of Santa Fe's circular path using trigonometric relations involving the Earth's radius and the latitude. The calculation involves using the formula for the circumference of a circle and dividing it by the time it takes for one complete rotation of the Earth, which is 24 hours. The participants successfully engage in the mathematical process to derive the linear speed.
699427535
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Santa Fe is approximately 33.88 degrees north of the equator. Given that the Earth's radius at the equator is 3960 mi and the Earth spins around its axis completely in 24 hours, what is the linear speed of Santa Fe around the Earth's axis in mi/hr?

I don't know where to start! Thank you so much!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Consider the following diagram showing a cross-section of the Earth cut with a plane containing the axis of rotation. the vertex of the right triangle containg the angle \(\theta\) is at the center of the Earth. The value \(a\) is the radius of the circular path of Sante Fe as the Earth rotates.

View attachment 8830

Can you find a way to relate the radius of the Earth \(r_E\), the latitude \(\theta=33.88^{\circ}\) and \(a\)?
 

Attachments

  • mhb_0009.png
    mhb_0009.png
    5 KB · Views: 114
Thank you so much! I figured it out as soon as I saw your diagram.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top