What is the link between tobacco and cancer risk?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NeedBioInfo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cancer
AI Thread Summary
Genetics significantly influence cancer risk, with family history being a crucial factor. Environmental factors also play a vital role, including smoking, which is linked to lung cancer due to the presence of radioactive polonium-210 in tobacco. This substance, derived from phosphate fertilizers, can create harmful "hot spots" in lung tissue, contributing to cancer development. Other risk factors mentioned include exposure to kitchen fumes, low IQ, poor antioxidant status, and radon exposure, particularly in poorly ventilated homes. Individuals with a family history of cancer should consult healthcare professionals for genetic testing and personalized risk assessments. Understanding these risks and taking preventive measures is essential for lowering cancer risk.
NeedBioInfo
Messages
177
Reaction score
0
Whats been known to increase a person's risk of getting cancer?

I know a person's genetics have been shown to increase a person's risk of getting cancer
I know certain foods have been shown to increase a person's risk of getting cancer
I know (Obviously) smoking has been shown to increase a person's risk of getting cancer
and I know sun exposure has been shown to increase a person's risk of getting cancer

But what else has? I was just wondering because my friend has a family history of cancer and I wanted to talk to her about what she can do to lower her risks

thanks
 
Biology news on Phys.org
How great is your friend's risk of cancer? Does she know she is at such high risk? Sometimes not even knowing you are at risk can increase the chances of getting it because you aren't taking the precautions to lower your risk. I'll look up some other risk factors.

~Kitty
 
She knows she's high risk because of her family history but i don't think she's gone to a doctor or anything about it; (She pretty much grew up living with her grandma) I let her know that she could get tested for genetic markers and stuff though.

But I don't think she knows the precautions that she can take to lower her risk, that's why I was asking about them

thanks
 
Ah, well at least she knows that she is at risk.

~Kitty
 
NeedBioInfo said:
Whats been known to increase a person's risk of getting cancer?
Exposure to kitchen fumes. Low IQ. Poor antioxidant status.
 
I think the largest cancer risk that you haven't mentioned is radon.
 
what type of cancer? different types of cancer have different causes and risk factors. Excessive sun exposure increases the risk of skin cancer, but not other forms of cancer. Smoking and high radon concentrations (usually only a problem in poorly ventilated houses with basements or on slab) increases the risk of lung cancer.

Genetics and family history can put a person at higher risk for some cancers while risk factors for other cancers are mainly environmental, with little or no genetic component.

If it's really an issue of concern for your friend, the best advice would be to have her express her concerns to her family physician and perhaps see about getting a referral to an oncologist or genetic counsellor for a more thorough assessment.
 
Last edited:
There are some new and very interesting facts about smoking and cancer. Did you know that tobacco is actually radioactive.
There is something called Polonium 210, It is an alpha radiation that is found in the soil used to grow tobacco. In fact it is from the phoshate fertilizers used. Alpha radiation is different to nornal radiation in that it cannot pass through skin or even paper BUT when brought into contact with live tissue it creates what are called 'Hot Spots.' They are like open wounds that will not heal and as you smoke these wounds are attacked by the chemicals in tobacco smoked inhaled into the lungs.
The Polonium 210 deposited in the average "pack a day" smoker, which has a half life of 158+ days (that means half of it's mass is converted into lead, and the radioactive emissions are delivered directly to your lungs), delivers enough radiation as it decays; to be equal to the amount of radiation you'd get if you had between 300 and 8000 Chest X-Rays per year.

Not only that but this bears direct relation to the increase in lung cancer rates since the Clacium Phosphate fertilizers were introduced. Lung cancer rates among men kept climbing from a rarity in 1930 (4/100,000 per year) to the No. 1 cancer killer in 1980 (72/100,000) in spite of an almost 20 percent reduction in smoking. But during the same period, the level of polonium 210 in American tobacco had tripled. This coincided with the increase in the use of phosphate fertilizers by tobacco growers.

However smoking also attributes in another way. To be able to smoke and not cough and be sick everytime your immune system has to shut down. By shutting down it is unable to alert you to the change in cell structure in your body. This is one of the fundamental functions of the imune system. An early warning system. What happens is that by the time the body realizes something is wrong it is usualy quite far advnaced. If however you were a nonsmoker the imune system would alert you much earlier giving you optimum chance if recovery.

The Surgeon General C. Everett Koop stated that radioactivity, rather than tar, accounts for at least 90% of all smoking-related lung cancers.

The sad thing is that the tobacco companies know this but still continue to advocate phosphate fertilizers by tobacco growers.

Thanks
Ian
 
Back
Top