What is the magnetic boundary conditions between air and copper?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the magnetic boundary conditions between air and copper, specifically regarding surface current density and the behavior of static and time-varying magnetic fields in conductors. It is established that free current density exists at the boundary of perfect conductors like copper, which behaves similarly to an ideal conductor. Static magnetic fields can penetrate an ideal conductor, while time-varying fields cannot. The conversation also highlights the importance of understanding the tangential boundary conditions, which indicate that current is primarily constrained to the surface. Overall, the participants seek clarity on how to quantify surface current density and the implications of these magnetic boundary conditions.
yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
294
I understand \vec J_{free} only exist on boundary surface of perfect conductors. Copper is close enough and have surface current. Also copper is paramagnetic material which implies \mu_{cu} = \mu_0 or very very close.

In order to find the exact angle of the of the magnetic field inside the perfect conductor like copper, we need to know the magnitude of the current density. My question is how do I find the quantity of the surface current density?

I read somewhere that I cannot find again...that static magnetic field cannot penetrade perfect conductor. Is this true?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If by J_{free} you mean current density of free (as opposed to bound) electric charge, that can exist inside an ideal conductor, the only things constrained at the surface of ideal conductors are static charge and time-varying currents.

The boundary conditions for magnetic fields across an interface can be found http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interface_conditions_for_electromagnetic_fields"

A static magnetic field can exist inside an ideal conductor, time varying fields cannot.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
dgOnPhys said:
If by J_{free} you mean current density of free (as opposed to bound) electric charge No, it is the free \vec {J_s} , that can exist inside an ideal conductor, the only things constrained at the surface of ideal conductors are static charge and time-varying currents.

The boundary conditions for magnetic fields across an interface can be found http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interface_conditions_for_electromagnetic_fields"

A static magnetic field can exist inside an ideal conductor, time varying fields cannot.

Thanks for your reply. I figure that the static mag field can penetrate an ideal conductor. I forgot the formula

\hat {n_2} X ( \vec {H_2} - \vec {H_1}) = \vec {J_s}

But that also bring back to the point that by definition of tangential boundary condition that the current is limited on the surface as the formula indicated. But I can see your point that current don't have to stay on the surface of the ideal conductor as oppose to the charge.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top