What is the magnitude of the acceleration of mass 1 in this system?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jesusjones
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Systems
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two masses connected by a pulley system. The original poster seeks to determine the magnitude of the acceleration of mass 1, which is hanging freely, while mass 2 rests on a frictionless table. The problem includes parameters such as the radius and moment of inertia of the pulley, as well as the weights of the two masses.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to set up equations of motion for the system but expresses confusion regarding the correct mass to use in their calculations. They question whether the mass in their equation should represent only the hanging mass or the total mass of the system.
  • Some participants question the inclusion of the second mass's weight in the equations and the implications of using conservation of energy as an alternative approach.
  • Others suggest that the setup of forces and torques may need reconsideration, particularly regarding the net torque on the pulley.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring different interpretations of the problem and the equations involved. Some have proposed alternative methods, such as conservation of energy, while others are clarifying the roles of the various forces and masses in the system. There is no explicit consensus yet, but several productive lines of inquiry are being pursued.

Contextual Notes

There appears to be some ambiguity in the problem statement regarding the definitions of mass and acceleration in the context of the pulley system. The original poster also notes potential confusion stemming from the wording of the question.

jesusjones
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I need some clarification here...

Homework Statement



There are two masses and a pulley.

The pulley has R = .12m and I = .09 kgm^2

Mass 1 in hangs freely in the air and is 4kg

mass 2 is on a table(no friction) and is 6kg


I am finding the magnitude of the accel of mass 1

Homework Equations






The Attempt at a Solution



I set this up to solve for accel of m1

Ma = m1g - T - m2g (where the M is the mass of both blocks)

T(tension) = F(force) = τ/r(torque radius) = Ia/r^2 (inertia , accel of blocks radius)

and so Ma = m1g - Ia/r^2 - m2a

I end up with 1.7 m/s^2 but the answer should be 2.4 m/s^2.

Now if M instead of being the added mass of both blocks is changed to only the mass of m1 the answer is 2.4 m/s^2. But I am convinced that M should be the mass of both blocks. What is going on here?? why is it only the mass of block 1 or did I do something else wrong.
Or is possibly just the wording of the question. The accel of the system would be 1.7m?s^2 but the magnitude of the accel for m1 is 2.4 m/s^2 ( maybe??) I'm confused already and need this straightened out so I can get back on track

Thanks for your time,
Andrew
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I seem to have figured this out for myself.

The Ma on the left side of my equation needed to be only the mass of the block in question. It seems that for systems of two blocks where one block is on a horizontal plane the M in Ma is only the block that is hanging freely and has accel due to gravity.

but if the plane is not horizontal then the M in Ma is the total mass of the system (m1 + m2)

Playing around with this http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/incpl2.html#c1
and testing my formulas seems to show this is true. If anything I've said here is wrong please correct me.
 
jesusjones said:
Ma = m1g - T - m2g (where the M is the mass of both blocks)

I don't get this bit. What is the m2g term? The weight of the second block?
 
You have only one T.
So the net T is zero, no net torque to the pulley.

Like pulling 3 masses. The second/center should experienced net force(one pulling forward and other pulling back) for it to move.
 
Last edited:
I wasn't sure about exactly how to set up the forces as I haven't done one of these for a while - but then I had the idea to use the conservation of energy, because I'm absolutely certain that this is true! Seems to me that...

m1gv = [itex]\frac{d}{dt}[/itex](1/2 m1v2)+[itex]\frac{d}{dt}[/itex](1/2 m2v2)+[itex]\frac{d}{dt}[/itex](1/2 (I/r2)v2)

I applied the product rule for differentiating each of the KE terms on the right and then fiddled with the algebra a bit before ending up with about 2.4 ms-2. So I'd say that the 2.4 ms-2 answer is correct - but you might not want to take my word for this!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K