What is the magnitude of the acceleration of mass 1 in this system?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jesusjones
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Systems
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the acceleration of mass 1 in a system involving two masses and a pulley. The initial calculation yielded an acceleration of 1.7 m/s², while the expected value was 2.4 m/s². It was clarified that when analyzing the forces, the mass used in the equation should only be that of the hanging block (mass 1) rather than the total mass of both blocks. The confusion stemmed from the inclusion of terms that did not accurately represent the forces acting on the system. Ultimately, the correct approach confirms that the acceleration of mass 1 is indeed 2.4 m/s².
jesusjones
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I need some clarification here...

Homework Statement



There are two masses and a pulley.

The pulley has R = .12m and I = .09 kgm^2

Mass 1 in hangs freely in the air and is 4kg

mass 2 is on a table(no friction) and is 6kg


I am finding the magnitude of the accel of mass 1

Homework Equations






The Attempt at a Solution



I set this up to solve for accel of m1

Ma = m1g - T - m2g (where the M is the mass of both blocks)

T(tension) = F(force) = τ/r(torque radius) = Ia/r^2 (inertia , accel of blocks radius)

and so Ma = m1g - Ia/r^2 - m2a

I end up with 1.7 m/s^2 but the answer should be 2.4 m/s^2.

Now if M instead of being the added mass of both blocks is changed to only the mass of m1 the answer is 2.4 m/s^2. But I am convinced that M should be the mass of both blocks. What is going on here?? why is it only the mass of block 1 or did I do something else wrong.
Or is possibly just the wording of the question. The accel of the system would be 1.7m?s^2 but the magnitude of the accel for m1 is 2.4 m/s^2 ( maybe??) I'm confused already and need this straightened out so I can get back on track

Thanks for your time,
Andrew
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I seem to have figured this out for myself.

The Ma on the left side of my equation needed to be only the mass of the block in question. It seems that for systems of two blocks where one block is on a horizontal plane the M in Ma is only the block that is hanging freely and has accel due to gravity.

but if the plane is not horizontal then the M in Ma is the total mass of the system (m1 + m2)

Playing around with this http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/incpl2.html#c1
and testing my formulas seems to show this is true. If anything I've said here is wrong please correct me.
 
jesusjones said:
Ma = m1g - T - m2g (where the M is the mass of both blocks)

I don't get this bit. What is the m2g term? The weight of the second block?
 
You have only one T.
So the net T is zero, no net torque to the pulley.

Like pulling 3 masses. The second/center should experienced net force(one pulling forward and other pulling back) for it to move.
 
Last edited:
I wasn't sure about exactly how to set up the forces as I haven't done one of these for a while - but then I had the idea to use the conservation of energy, because I'm absolutely certain that this is true! Seems to me that...

m1gv = \frac{d}{dt}(1/2 m1v2)+\frac{d}{dt}(1/2 m2v2)+\frac{d}{dt}(1/2 (I/r2)v2)

I applied the product rule for differentiating each of the KE terms on the right and then fiddled with the algebra a bit before ending up with about 2.4 ms-2. So I'd say that the 2.4 ms-2 answer is correct - but you might not want to take my word for this!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top