What is the Mass of LiHCO_3 in the Original Mixture?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the mass of LiHCO_3 in a chemical reaction involving the decomposition of lithium bicarbonate. The initial mass of the mixture is 9.62 g, with a final mass of 6.85 g after the reaction, indicating a mass loss of 2.77 g due to CO_2 and H2O. This loss corresponds to an initial mass of 0.79 g of LiHCO_3, based on the stoichiometry of the reaction. However, there is confusion regarding mass conservation, as the calculated mass of SiO2 and the lost gases exceeds the original mixture's mass. The conversation emphasizes the need to check calculations and understand the proportions involved in the reaction.
PhizKid
Messages
477
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Given the reaction: 2LiHCO_3 + SiO_2 \rightarrow Li_{2}CO_3 + SiO_2 + CO_2 + H_{2}O where SiO_2 is unaffected, the mass of the 2LiHCO_3 + SiO_2 is 9.62 g. and Li_{2}CO_3 + SiO_2 is 6.85 g., find:

a) mass loss due to CO_2 + H_{2}O
b) mass of LiHCO_3 in the original mixture
c) mass of SiO_2 in the new mixture

The Attempt at a Solution


a)The mass lost is just 9.62 g. - 6.85 g. = 2.77 g. of CO_2 + H_{2}O

b) For every 136 g. of LiHCO_3, 62 g. are lost to CO_2 + H_{2}O. So if 2.77 g. are lost to CO_2 + H_{2}O, then there was initially 0.79 g. of LiHCO_3

c) Since the mass of SiO_2 does not change, 9.62 g. in the original - 0.79 g. of LiHCO_3 = 8.83 g. SiO_2. But 8.83 g. of SiO_2 + 2.77 g. of CO_2 + H_{2}O is greater than 9.62 g. of the original mixture, so mass is not conserved. I don't think this is possible so I don't know what to do
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't trust my method on this one but I can get the numbers to add up.

Take your mass of C02 + H20 and work out the number of moles of CO2 AND H2O molecules you have.

Then use the ratios of the balancing numbers to work out the moles of the other reactants.

Then multiply by the RFM of the reactant to get the mass.

Ok that probably makes very little sense, but it might help.
 
PhizKid said:
So if 2.77 g. are lost to CO_2 + H_{2}O, then there was initially 0.79 g. of LiHCO_3

Check your math. Logic is sound, but you got your proportions wrong.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top