What is the mass of the bottom weight in this pulley system?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the mass of the unknown weight in the pulley system, the acceleration of the 3kg weight must first be calculated using kinematics, given that it moves 81.6 cm in 2.55779 seconds. The acceleration due to gravity is 9.8 m/s², and since the system is frictionless, the tension in the string affects both weights equally. By applying Newton's second law, the force of tension can be established, which is equal for both the 3kg weight and the unknown mass. The relationship between the forces and the known mass allows for the calculation of the unknown mass. The process involves understanding the dynamics of the system and applying the relevant physics principles effectively.
bignasty
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
The system is a 3kg weight on a table top attached to a string leading to a pulley at the end of the table. Attached to the string straight down is a weight with an unknown mass:


( )--------------- 3kg
l
l
l
l
? kg

Question:
The system shown is released from rest and moves 81.6 cm in 2.55779 seconds. The acceleration of gravity is 9.8m/s^2. What it the mass in kg of the bottom weight. All surfaces are frictionless.

Please, if someone could explain the process to me, or perhaps even provide the correct answer so I can work backwards, it would be greatly appreciated, or perhaps even
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
any ideas??
heres a hint: The force of tension on the 3kg weight equals the force of tension on the unknown mass.
Use kinematics equations to find the accleration of the 3kg weight, then use Newton's 2nd law to find the force of tension.

Both boxes will have the same magnitude of acceleration.
 
Thanks

Thanks for the tip, I finally got it!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
860
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
7K
Replies
29
Views
5K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Back
Top