What is the mass of the planet and its moon using Kepler's 3rd law?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vivic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Planet
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the mass of a planet and its moon using Kepler's 3rd law, given the planet's orbital period around the Sun and the moon's orbital characteristics. The user applies the small angle formula to determine the moon's orbital radius and attempts to use the modified Kepler's law equation to find the combined mass of the planet and moon. Clarifications are sought regarding the relative mass of the moon and the role of the planet's orbital period in the calculations. Key insights emphasize that the planet's mass does not significantly affect the moon's orbit due to the gravitational influences of other celestial bodies. The conversation encourages deriving the equations to better understand the relationships involved.
vivic
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A planet orbits around the Sun with an orbital period of 14.5 years. It is observed it has a moon. At opposition, the moon has an almost circular orbit, and a radius of 7 arcminutes as seen from the telescope. Its orbital period around the planet is 3 days. What is the mass of the planet?

Homework Equations


Newton's ver Kepler's 3rd law: p^2 = [4pi^2/(G*M1+M2)]*a^3
G=6.67x10^-11 m^3/kgs^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I used the small angle formula to get "a";
at oppositon, a=(7")(1deg/60")(1.5x10^8km)(2pi/360deg)= 3.05x10^5km
p=72hrs*(3600sec/hr)
(Mplanet+Mmoon)= [4pi^2*a^3]/[G*p^2]

Am I doing this correctly? How do I find the mass of the moon since it doesn't state the relative mass is small enough to be negligible. Where does the orbital period of the planet come into play?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check your Keplers 3rd law, the orbit of a planet around another is independent of its own mass. You may have some difficultly accepting then why we don't see the Sun orbiting the Earth once every 100 years or so but remember all of the other planets etc, it's being pulled from many angles resulting in little effect. Whereas in this case it's safe to assume that the only force on the moon is that of the planet.

(Hint : derive it yourself by considering the equations )

\frac{mv^2}{r} = \frac{GMm}{r^2}
v = \frac{2\pi r}{T}
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top