What Is the Maximum Height of the Rocket After Engine Failure?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum height of a rocket after its engine fails 30 seconds post-launch, where it initially accelerates at 2.60 m/s². The initial calculation for height at 30 seconds is 1170 m, but the online system indicates this is incorrect. Participants clarify that the rocket does not stop instantly upon engine failure; instead, it continues to ascend until gravity decelerates it to a halt. The conversation suggests using kinematic equations and velocity-time graphs to analyze the rocket's motion after engine failure. Understanding the transition from powered ascent to freefall is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
revults
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A rock of blasts of vertically from rest on the launch pad with an upward acceleration 2.60 m/s^2= At 30s after blast off, the engine suddenly fails, which means the force they instantly stops.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



How high above the launch pad will the rocket eventually go?

height = ½at² = ½•2.6m/s²•(30s)² = 1170 m

I keeping getting that answer, but the online system says its wrong.
Also I have no idea how to solve this.

Find the magnitude of the rocket's acceleration at its highest point.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct, that's the height at 30 seconds. If the engines fail at 30 seconds, does that mean the rocket stops there and begins to freefall?

For the second part, think about the velocity of the rocket at its highest point.Alex
 
yeah the force they produce instantly stopI rewrote the question in the way it was typed in my online assigment.
 
A good analogy is putting your foot on the brake in your car. When you brake, does the car instantaneously stop?

In this case, the rocket engine failing is "applying the brake" and gravity is "pushing the brake pedal".

This equation may help (rearrange the variables): vf = v0 + atAlex
 
Plotting the graph of speed x time and thinking about what is the meaning of the area in this graph might make the problem easier.

The speed x time graph usually comes in handy when you're dealing with mixed accelerations. :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top