What Is the Maximum Speed a Rower Can Achieve with 1 kW Power?

  • Thread starter Thread starter marty456
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boat Power Speed
marty456
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Dear all, I need help with an old exam question. It goes as following:

The maximum power that a certain athlete can produce is equal to 1 kW. What is the theoretical maximum speed that a rower can obtain in a rowboat with a smooth exterior, a length of 4 meter and a 'wet' surface of 2.8 m^2.

Homework Equations


No equations are given and I can't think of any. However, the density of air (1.2 kg/m^3), the dynamic viscosity of air (1.8*10^-5 Pa s), the density of water (1000 kg/m^3), the dynamic viscosity of air (0.0010 Pa s) are all given, though it does not say which (if any) I should use.

The Attempt at a Solution



I have been attempting to recreate a formula based on the units of the various components. One formula for power = force * speed, so speed=Power/force. For force, which is in Newton, I tried multiplying the viscosity of the water with the 'wet' area. The resulting number would have Newton as its unit (Pa*s*m^2 is equal to kg*m/s=Newton). However, this left me with a speed in the 6 digits, which I don't think is a realistic answer for a row boat.
I have tried other combinations as well, but these don't result in the right unit (m/s). Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top