What is the meaning of 'relative' and 'apparent' in Newton's concept of time?

In summary, Newton's "Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica" states that there is an absolute, true, and mathematical time that flows independently of external factors, while relative, apparent, and common time is a measurement of duration based on motion. "Relative" in this context refers to the variability of different instruments in measuring mathematical time, while "apparent" means that these measurements are not the actual mathematical time but serve as a substitute.
  • #1
Aleoa
128
5
In the masterpiece "Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica" , Newton says:

"Absolute, true, and mathematical time, of itself, and from its own nature, flows equably without relation to anything external, and by another name is called duration: relative, apparent, and common time, is some sensible and external (whether accurate or unequable) measure of duration by the means of motion, which is commonly used instead of true time"

All this sentence seems clear to me, except the two adjective: relative and apparent. For you, what's is the meaning the Newton gives to this two adjectives in this context ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
He seems to be intending to distinguish ”mathematical time” and actual time measurements that act as observational placeholders. They would be relative in the sense that the precision of different instruments in finding a number corresponding to mathematical time might differ and apparent in that they are not actually the mathematical time but being used as a proxy.
 
  • Like
Likes Aleoa
  • #3
Aleoa said:
All this sentence seems clear to me, except the two adjective: relative and apparent. For you, what's is the meaning the Newton gives to this two adjectives in this context ?
I wouldn’t spend too much effort on this. It is a translation of a very out of date document describing a concept that has been largely abandoned. It is only of historical interest.
 
  • Like
Likes Aleoa and Orodruin
  • #4
Orodruin said:
He seems to be intending to distinguish ”mathematical time” and actual time measurements that act as observational placeholders. They would be relative in the sense that the precision of different instruments in finding a number corresponding to mathematical time might differ and apparent in that they are not actually the mathematical time but being used as a proxy.

Thanks. And the term "apparent" ?
 

What is Newton's Concept of Time?

Newton's concept of time is based on the idea that time is an absolute and universal quantity that flows at a constant rate. This means that time is the same for everyone and everything, and it does not change or vary depending on different circumstances.

How did Newton develop his concept of time?

Newton developed his concept of time in his famous work, the Principia Mathematica, which was published in 1687. In this work, he proposed the laws of motion and the law of universal gravitation, which helped shape his understanding of time as an absolute and unchanging quantity.

What is the difference between Newton's concept of time and Einstein's theory of relativity?

The main difference between Newton's concept of time and Einstein's theory of relativity is that Newton believed time to be absolute and unchanging, while Einstein's theory states that time is relative and can be affected by factors such as gravity and velocity.

How does Newton's concept of time relate to his laws of motion?

Newton's concept of time is closely related to his laws of motion. His first law states that an object will remain at rest or in motion at a constant velocity unless acted upon by an external force. This law is based on the idea of time being a constant and unchanging quantity.

Has Newton's concept of time been proven incorrect?

While Newton's concept of time was groundbreaking and revolutionary at the time, it has since been modified and expanded upon by Einstein's theory of relativity. While some aspects of Newton's concept still hold true, it is not considered to be completely accurate in light of modern physics.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
845
Replies
9
Views
841
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
17
Views
591
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
1K
Back
Top