What is the mechanism of small holes in auditorioms used as sound

AI Thread Summary
Small holes in auditoriums serve as sound absorbers by disrupting sound waves, which are larger than the holes themselves. This mechanism helps to break up and disperse sound reflections, reducing echoes. The incorporation of soft materials alongside these holes enhances sound absorption, further minimizing reverberation. Overall, this design improves acoustic quality in performance spaces. Effective sound management is crucial for optimal auditory experiences in auditoriums.
Rohan Sahuji
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
what is the mechanism of small holes in auditorioms used as sound absorbers
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Rohan Sahuji said:
what is the mechanism of small holes in auditorioms used as sound absorbers

The holes are small compared to the wavelengths of most audible sound waves. This helps to break up the waves and disperse the reflection. In addition, the use of relatively soft materials helps to absorb sound rather than echoing it back.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top