What is the Median of a Quadratic Function f(x) with a Given Range and Area?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maatttt0
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Median Quadratic
Maatttt0
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given that:

f(x) = 2(1-x) for 0 < x < k
...0 for otherwise

sketch the graph of f(x) and find:

(i) the value of k,

(ii) the median of x

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



(i) I sketched the graph and got a line from (0,2) to (1,0) which has an area of 1, so k = 1.

(ii) ^{}M_{}0\int(2 - 2x) = 1/2
The code is messing up but intergation of (2 - 2x) with m (median) as the top limit and 0 being the bottom one and it = 1/2

[2x - x^2]m0 = 1/2

2m - m2 = 1/2

I'm stuck on getting m separated as it's a negative square

Help me please :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try arranging the equation so all terms are on one side.
 
You don't really need to integrate to get this. y= 2(1- x) is a straight line from (0, 2) to (k, 2(1- k)).

If k= 1, the area under it is the area of the triangle with height 2 and base 1 and so area (1/2)(2)(1= 1. That is what we need to have in order to have a valid probability distribution.

As a check, if k< 1, the area under the line is the area of the trapezoid with bases 2 and 2(1- k) and height k. It's area is k(2+ 2(1- k))/2= k(4- 2k)/2= k(2- k) and we want that equal to 1. k(2- k)= 2k- k^2= 1 is the same as k^2- 2k+ 1= (k- 1)^2= 0. As before, it reduces to k= 1, the triangle case.
(You say "I sketched the graph and got a line from (0,2) to (1,0)". Well, you couldn't know it would be a line from (0, 2) to (1, 0) until after you knew that k= 1.)

Now the median is where the area both left and right is equal to 1/2. If we take that to be at "x", then we have a triangle on the right with base 1- x and height 2(1- x) which has area (1/2)(1-x)(2(1-x))= (1- x)^2 and we want that equal to 1/2: (1- x)^2= 2. Solve that for x.

If you really want to integrate, you are integrating
\int_0^x 2(1- t)dt= 2 \int_0^x 1- t dt= 2\left(x- (1/2)x^2)= 1/2[/itex]] which gives the same result.<br /> <br /> You can simplify that integral by letting u= 1- t so that du= -dt, when t= 0, u= 1 and when t= x, u= 1- x. Now the integral is 2\int_0^{1- x}u^2du= 1/2[/=itex], giving, again, the same result.
 
Thanks for the input to both of you :)

I understand now thanks, HallsOfIvy :smile: woo!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top