What is the Method for Solving an Easy Triple Integral Problem?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves using a triple integral to calculate the volume of a solid located in the first octant, bounded by the coordinate planes and the plane defined by the equation 3x + 6y + 4z = 12.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss setting up the triple integral with varying limits for x, y, and z. There are attempts to clarify the correct limits based on the geometry of the solid and the equation of the plane. Some participants express uncertainty about their initial limits and the integration process.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on the setup of the integral and questioning the limits of integration. There are multiple interpretations being explored regarding the limits for x and y, and some participants are addressing potential errors in their calculations.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention confusion regarding the notation used in the integrals and the need to clarify the upper limits for integration. There is also a concern raised about obtaining a negative volume, which suggests a need for further examination of the setup and calculations.

frozenguy
Messages
186
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use a triple integral to find the volume of the solid.
The solid in the first octant bounded by the coordinate planes and the plane 3x+6y+4z=12


Homework Equations




[tex]z=3-\frac{3}{4}x-\frac{3}{2}y[/tex]





The Attempt at a Solution


So I'm using the triple integral type of dzdydx.

At first I set z and x to 0, then z and y to 0 to obtain x and y limits but I think that was incorrect. I'm trying to integrate 3x+6y+4z-12.

I guess the upper limits of z will be the above equation done in editor, z=3-3x/4-3y/2 and lower limit will be 0?

That integration gets really dirty really quick. I doubt it is right. Can someone help point me in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
that sound like the way to go, why not try...

shouldn't get too bad as its just polynomials
[tex]\int_0^{?}dx \int_0^{?} dx\int_0^{3-\frac{3}{4}x-\frac{3}{2}y} dz[/tex]
 
lanedance wrote that integral in a very pecular way- especially with two "dx"s! Clearly a typo.

I would write it as
[tex]\int_{x= 0}^a \int_{y=0}^{f(x)}\int_{z= 0}^{3- \frac{3}{4}x- \frac{3}{2}y}dz dy dx[/tex]

That last integral, with respect to x, must give a numeric answer, of course, so the two limits must be numbers. What is the largest value x can take in this figure?

The second integral, with respect to y, can give a function of x. For every x, what is the largest value y can have? Projecting this figure into the z value is the same as taking z= 0. Since 3x+ 6y+ 4z= 12 becomes the line 3x+ 6y= 12 when z= 0: 6y= 12- 3x so what is y as a function of x?

Of course, for each (x, y), z goes from 0 up to the plane 3x+ 6y+ 4z= 12 which is what gives the formula for z that you give and the upper limit for the "z" integral.
 
yep thanks Halls, meant
[tex]\int_0^{a}dx \int_0^{f(x)} dy\int_0^{3-\frac{3}{4}x-\frac{3}{2}y} dz[/tex]

nice explanation, apologies if the notation confused things, I find it easier to keep track of the integrals in the operator notation.

Frozenguy, meant the same thing as Hall's post, but work with whatever you're comfortable with.
 
Ok so y=2-x/2 and that is the upper limit for dy?
So when it comes to that upper z limit getting squared I distributed the whole thing but now I'm thinking I didn't have to haha.

So is that the right track for the limits? and dx limits will be [0,4] correct?
 
frozenguy said:
Ok so y=2-x/2 and that is the upper limit for dy?
So when it comes to that upper z limit getting squared I distributed the whole thing but now I'm thinking I didn't have to haha.

So is that the right track for the limits? and dx limits will be [0,4] correct?
sounds good - not sure why you were squaring things, but sounds like you're on the right track now
 
So can someone see any red flags? I'm getting a negative volume which doesn't make sense and plus the book says the answer is 4.
155-15.jpg
 
your initial integrand should just be the volume element dV = dx.dy.dz = 1.dx.dy.dz
 
In the form Hall's wrote:

[tex]\int \int \int dV <br /> = \int_{x= 0}^4 \int_{y=0}^{3-x/2}\int_{z= 0}^{3- \frac{3}{4}x- \frac{3}{2}y}1.dz dy dx[/tex]
 
  • #10
oh... Why is that? lol I'll try to read up on it but why don't we need to integrate a specific formula?

Thanks so much for your help
 
  • #11
no think of the integral as [itex]\int_0^a f(x) dx[/itex] adding up thr contribution from infintesimal itegrand (f(x) dx) over 0<x<a. If f(x) =1, [itex]\int_0^a f(x) dx[/itex] just adds up each incremental length dx to find the total 'x' length.

For the volume integral its the same, [itex]\int \int \int dV = \int \int \int dx.dy.dz[/itex]. So as we want to calcaute the volume intergal think of it as adding up each infinitesimal block dV = dx.dy.dz, so the "function" to integrate must be identically 1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K