What is the Minimum Force Required for the Bracket?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Emilio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Minimum
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
13 replies · 5K views
Emilio
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If the resultant force acting on the bracket is required to be a minimum, determine the magnitude of F1. Set Φ=31°
XllYL1D.png


Homework Equations


Fx=F(cos(θ))
Fy=F(sin(θ))

The Attempt at a Solution


First I tried to find ∑Fx and ∑Fy
ΣFx=0=200+cos(67.38)260+cos(59)F1x
ΣFy=0=sin(67.38)260+sin(59)F1y

Solving for F1, I got
x=-384.06
y=279.99

And then to find the magnitude, I found the root of the sum of their squares

√(-384.06² + 279.99²)=479.335N

which was wrong.

A few things: I know the x-component can't be negative, it makes no sense, but I don't know what to change to make it positive. I also don't know what is implied by "required to be a minimum."
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
NascentOxygen said:
Something important missing here?
I'm not sure what you mean, am I missing a step or did I leave something out? All it says in the prompt is "Set ϕ = 31° ."
 
NascentOxygen said:
There's a degree symbol? So what did you set to be 31°?
Oh sorry, I see a degree symbol in my original post, not sure why it doesn't show up.

nAUgaKZ.png


I did set ϕ = to 31°, but I used 59° in my equations just because it was a little easier to visualize for me. I didn't think it would make a difference because sin(31)=cos(59).
 
NascentOxygen said:
The phi isn't showing up on my screen, it's just a blank space.
Oh that's odd, I even see the phi in your quoted text. I rewrote it using the editor instead of copy-pasting symbols, so hopefully it looks a little more accurate.
 
What does it mean to find a minimum? A minimum force that would keep it in equilibrium? The smallest possible resultant force?
 
NascentOxygen said:
The resultant sum of those 3 external forces is to be its smallest possible value.
So instead of ∑Fx,y being equal to 0, they should equal the smallest possible value?

Wouldn't that be Fx=0 and Fy=0?
 
Emilio said:
So instead of ∑Fx,y being equal to 0, they should equal the smallest possible value?

Wouldn't that be Fx=0 and Fy=0?
The character set you are using seems problematical. I saw Fy= -∞ in your post, which seemed a puzzling value; yet when I quote that to respond, that -∞ has transformed into a 0. You should be using the characters that appear when you tap ##\Sigma## in the forum editor toolbar, or else use Latex.

You can't make the resultant horizontal force equal to zero, as all forces have a component to the right---there is not going to be any cancelling in the x-direction.
 
I had typed -∞ at first, but after considering it, I realized it didn't make sense so I changed it to 0.

So I can't set Fx=0, but I want to get this value as small as possible. Do I set up a limit as Fx approaches 0?
 
Emilio said:
I had typed -∞ at first, but after considering it, I realized it didn't make sense so I changed it to 0.
Just my caching problem, then.
So I can't set Fx=0, but I want to get this value as small as possible. Do I set up a limit as Fx approaches 0?
Probably not.

You had the right idea back in your opening post:
to find the magnitude, I found the root of the sum of their squares

So go back to your first post, and improve on that. If force up is +, then downwards will be -
200+cos(67.38)260+cos(59)F1x
That won't be F1x, it's just F1 because the cos converts it to the horizontal component.