What Is the Minimum Kinetic Energy Needed for Fusion in Stars?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fball558
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
Fusion in stars, such as the Sun, occurs when protons and deuterons collide, resulting in helium-3 and gamma rays. The electric potential energy when these nuclei are in contact is calculated to be 1.152e-13 J. To achieve fusion, the minimum total kinetic energy required for the particles to touch is also 1.152e-13 J, due to the conservation of energy principle. Initially, all energy is kinetic, and at the point of contact, it converts to potential energy. Understanding this energy relationship is crucial for studying stellar fusion processes.
fball558
Messages
143
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Fusion (or "thermonuclear") reactions take place inside a star such as our Sun. One fusion reaction results from a collision between a proton (1H) and a deuteron (2H, the nucleus of "heavy" hydrogen, consisting of a proton and a neutron). When these two nuclei touch, they undergo a nuclear reaction, forming a helium-3 (3He) nucleus (containing two protons and one neutron) and a high energy photon, called a gamma ray.

1H + 2H 3He +

One "unified atomic mass unit", denoted by the symbol "u", is equal to 1.66e-27 kg. The rest mass of the proton is 1.0073 u, the rest mass of the deuteron is 2.0136 u, the rest mass of the helium-3 nucleus is 3.0155 u, and the gamma ray is massless.

If the distance between the centers of the proton and the deuterium nucleus when they are in contact with each other is 2e-15 m, what is the electric potential energy in this state?
(answer is 1.152e-13 J and i know that is right)

now What is the minimum total kinetic energy the particles must have in order that they get close enough to touch each other?
(this is where I am stuck)


The Attempt at a Solution


im stuck really have not tried anything. was thinking conservation of energy, but don't know if that would give me the answer. also not sure what inital velocitys would be so can't use formula.

any ideas??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would the answer not be the same as the answer for the first question? (1.152e-13 J)
 
oh... yeah i guess so.
is that because of conservation of energy?
initaly there is no potential and all kenetic and
final state no kenetic and all potential?
 
Yes. You nailed it.
 
thanks alot
Imperitor!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top