What is the minimum size of a mirror for a person to see their whole image?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rambo5330
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mirror
AI Thread Summary
To determine the minimum size of a flat vertical mirror for a 178 cm tall person to see their entire image, the mirror needs to be at least half the height of the person, which is 89 cm. A ray diagram can help visualize how light rays from the person's feet and head reflect off the mirror. The critical aspect is ensuring that the mirror is positioned to capture all necessary light rays for a complete reflection. By drawing a stick figure and tracing the rays from the person's eyes to the top of their head and feet, the required dimensions of the mirror can be clarified. Thus, a mirror height of 89 cm is sufficient for the person to see their whole image.
rambo5330
Messages
83
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Quick question I can visualise but not determine mathematically..
The question in my text says:
Determine the MINIMUM size of a flat vertical mirror that a person 178 cm can see his whole image. It suggest that a ray diagram will help.




The Attempt at a Solution



well I could tell that the mirror should be less than the total 178 cm.. but even with the use of a ray diagram i keep getting a 1 to 1 thing going on... if object height equals 178cm and image height equals 178cm...my only thoughts are with the use of a ray diagram i guess there must be some critical for the reflected rays i should be looking for?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Excellent and classic question.

In your ray diagram, don't worry about the size of the image (per se). The mirror has to be big enough so that all of the required light rays pass through the mirror.

Maybe, try drawing a stick-figure person, in front of a flat mirror. Draw the rays so that the person can see their feet and the top of their head (from their eyes--of course). Where do those rays bounce off of the mirror?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top